A general approach to criteria aggregation using fuzzy measures

doi:10.1006/imms.1993.1059

International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

Volume 39, Issue 2, August 1993, Pages 187-213

https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1059 Get rights and content

Abstract

The central focus of this work is to provide a general formulation for the aggregation of multi-criteria. This formulation is based upon the use of fuzzy subsets to model the criteria and the use of fuzzy measures to capture the interrelationship between criteria. A form of the fuzzy integral is used to connect these two to obtain the overall decision function. We are particularly interested here in the formulations obtained under different assumptions about the nature of the underlying fuzzy measure. We show how a number of the classic aggregation methods fall out as special cases of this very general formulation.

References (0)

Cited by (54)

On extended power average operators for decision-making: A case study in emergency response plan selection of civil aviation
2019, Computers and Industrial Engineering
Citation Excerpt :
Information fusion processes based on the use of the aggregation operators constitute one of the most important and actively discussed issues in multi-attribute (group) decision-making(MADM/MAGDM) (Bottero, Ferretti, Figueira, Greco, & Roy, 2018; Horanská & S̆ipos̆ová, 2018; Qin, Liu, & Pedrycz, 2016; Yager, 1993).
The classical Power Average (PA) operator proposed by Yager implicitly restricts itself to an assumption that unduly high or low arguments are conceived as “false” or “biased” perceptions, thereby being assigned smaller weights for aggregation. However, on many occasions, these kinds of inputs to a great extent may be of significant importance to the accuracy of the aggregation outcomes, particularly when different sources of information are taken into consideration. The primary purpose of this paper is to adapt the PA operator to model generally various decision making settings where outliers are treated with different aggregation significance. The concept of Extended PA (EPA) operator is therefore proposed to effectively capture heterogeneous interrelationships among aggregation inputs. Several desirable properties of the EPA operator are investigated and their usefulness in practical decision making problems is highlighted. The choice of appropriate values for parameters associated with the EPA operator is likewise investigated. The proposed EPA operator is applied to develop an approach for multi-attribute decision making in which the interrelationships among the attributes and the inputs themselves are simultaneously taken into consideration. Finally, a case study in emergency response plan selection of civil aviation and a comparison analysis are provided to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
House of Strategy: A model for designing strategies using stakeholders’ opinion
2017, Computers and Industrial Engineering
Citation Excerpt :
Non-linear aggregation methods are available in fuzzy decision making, where the Order Weight Aggregator (OWA) is non-linear in nature. OWA are used to derive the weights for aggregation (Yager, 1993a, 1993b). Readers may refer literature (Cholewa, 1985; Delgado, Herrera, Herrera-Viedma, & Martínez, 1998; Irion, 1998; Montero de Juan, 1988; Park & Kim, 1996; Ramakrishnan & Rao, 1992; Xu, 2004, 2005; Yager, 1993a, 1993b, 1994; Zhang & Lu, 2003) for knowing more about type and choice of OWAs.
The paper presents building of a model, i.e. House of Strategy, out of a two-round Delphi survey, which can be used in strategic planning to develop sets of Goals, Objectives, and Strategies. The survey was made among the stakeholders of the Indian Shrimp Industry in order to set the future goals, and concurrent objectives and to design strategies to achieve them. The first round of Delphi survey resulted into generation of sets of Goal, Objectives, and Strategies. The second round of the survey gathered opinions of survey panelists regarding the desirability and feasibility of the Goals and Objectives, and feasibility and effectiveness of the Strategies. Consensuses of stakeholders’ opinions on the each of the items with respect to above said criteria were estimated using standard fuzzy consensus building algorithm. Hierarchical representation of a Goal, their corresponding Objectives and Strategies form a tree like structure, called as GOS tree. Seven such GOS trees were developed, each representing a Goal at its top echelon. Validity of each GOS tree was tested using the ratings of the panelists on the goal, objectives, and strategies with respect to the feasibility criterion. The proposed validation process of a GOS tree resulted two set of weights separately for the objectives and the strategies that explained the importance of each of the strategies in achieving the corresponding objective and importance of each of the objectives in aligning towards the goal. These importance weights of the objectives and the strategies were local to the GOS tree. Seven such GOS trees were developed each representing for a future goal. As a strategy might have presence in multiple GOS trees and contributing towards multiple goals, an overall contribution of the strategies was to be found out. We proposed a framework, House of Strategy, which can be used to combine all the GOS trees at one place and could help, in a two-step process, in finding out the overall contribution of each of the strategies towards overall achievement of Industry’s goals. The House of Strategy consisted of two sub-Houses, i.e. Goal-Objective (GO) and Objective-Strategy (OS) sub-Houses. In the first step, the GO sub-House calculated the overall priority of each of the Objectives depending on its local importance weights (with respect to each of the GOS tree it represented) and corresponding desirability of the local goal and its own desirability score. Similarly, in the second step, the OS sub-House helped in calculating the overall priority of each of the strategies depending upon the priority of its corresponding objectives (in a GOS tree) as derived by the GO sub-House, its local importance weights (with respect to each of the GOS tree it represented), and its own effectiveness score. Using the House of Strategy, we have prioritized the strategies raised during the Delphi survey. The proposed methodology of building the House of Strategy can be used for designing strategies for an organization/industry using stakeholders' opinion and prioritizing them in order of their overall importance in achieving intended objectives and goals. Furthermore, the House of Strategy can be used as an effective communication tool to portray the goals, objectives, and strategies along with their priorities at one place.
Modeling multi-criteria objective functions using fuzzy measures
2016, Information Fusion
Citation Excerpt :
These are conjunctive type aggregation operators and a close relationship exists between a t-norms and copulas. One application of measures and their related integrals is in multi-criteria decision-making [32]. Here we have a collection of relevant criteria, C = {C1, … , Cn} and a measure μ on C indicating the importance and other relationships between the criteria.
We introduce the idea of a measure. We describe several important finite integrals useful for obtaining an average value of a collection of argument values weighted by a measure. We particularly look at the case of binary measures and show that all integrals in this case evaluate to the same value. We describe the use of measures in multi-criteria decision making as a way of expressing a decision maker’s objective function in terms of collection of relevant criteria. We look at the role of an integral as a way to evaluate an alternative’s overall satisfaction to their objective function in terms of its satisfaction to the individual criteria. We look at a number of special types of measure based decision objective functions.
Jeffrey's rule of conditioning with various forms for uncertainty
2015, Information Fusion
Citation Excerpt :
Measures provide a very useful framework for representing information and knowledge. They have been used in many areas such as uncertainty modeling, multi-criteria decision making [18–20] and reliability modeling [21–23]. Our interest is in their use for model uncertainty.
We first introduce Jeffrey’s rule of conditioning and explain how it allows us to determine the probability of an event related to one variable from information about a collection of conditional probabilities of that event conditioned on the state another variable. We note that in the original Jeffrey paradigm we have the uncertainty about the state of the conditioning variable expressed as a probability distribution. Here we extend this by allowing alternative formulations for the uncertainty about the conditioning variable. We first consider the case where our uncertainty is expressed in terms of a measure. This allows us to consider the case where our uncertainty is a possibility distribution. We next consider the case where our uncertainty about the conditioning variable is expressed in terms of a Dempster–Shafer belief structure. Finally we consider the case where we are ignorant about the underlying distribution and must use the decision maker’s subjective attitude about the nature of uncertainty to provide the necessary information to use in the Jeffrey rule.
A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision support
2011, Decision Support Systems
In this paper, a distance-based group decision-making (GDM) methodology is proposed to solve unconventional multi-person multi-criteria emergency decision-making problems. In this model, some decision-makers are first identified to formulate a group decision-making framework. Then a standard multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process is performed on specific decision-making problems and different decision results are obtained from different decision-makers. Finally, these different decision results are aggregated into a group consensus to support the final decision-making. For illustration and verification purposes, a numerical example and a practical unconventional emergency decision case are presented. Experimental results obtained demonstrate that the proposed distance-based multi-criteria GDM methodology can improve decision-making objectivity and emergency management effectiveness.
Revising the OWA operator for multi criteria decision making problems under uncertainty
2009, European Journal of Operational Research
Multi criteria decision making (MCDM) problems are usually under uncertainty. One of these uncertain parameters is the decision maker (DM)’s degree of optimism, which has an important effect on the results. Fuzzy linguistic quantifiers are used to obtain the assessments of this parameter from DM and then, because of its uncertainty it is assumed to have stochastic nature. A new approach, entitled FSROWA, is introduced to combine the Fuzzy and Stochastic features into a Revised OWA operator.
If the DM is not aware of the risk in decision, then the decision objective is to maximize the expected combined goodness measure. If the DM cares only about the risk, then minimizing the variance of the combined goodness measure is his/her objective. The results of the FSROWA provide the expected value and the variance of the combined goodness measure for each alternative. In order to combine these two attributes a composite goodness measure is introduced. This measure gives more robust decision outcomes. The theoretical results are illustrated in a watershed management problem.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Regular ArticleA general approach to criteria aggregation using fuzzy measures

Abstract

Regular Article
A general approach to criteria aggregation using fuzzy measures