Regular Article
Deterministic and Randomized Bounded Truth-Table Reductions of P, NL, and L to Sparse Sets

https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1998.1589Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

We prove that there is no sparse hard set for P under logspace computable bounded truth-table reductions unless P=L. In case of reductions computable in NC1, the collapse goes down to P=NC1. We parameterize this result and obtain a generic theorem allowing us to vary the sparseness condition, the space bound and the number of queries of the truth-table reduction. Another instantiation yields that there is no quasipolynomially dense hard set for P under polylog-space computable truth-table reductions using polylogarithmically many queries unless P is in polylog-space. We also apply the proof technique to NL and L. We establish that there is no sparse hard set for NL under logspace computable bounded truth-table reductions unless NL=L and that there is no sparse hard set for L under NC1-computable bounded truth-table reductions unless L=NC1. We show that all these results carry over to the randomized setting: If we allow two-sided error randomized reductions with confidence at least inversely polynomial, we obtain collapses to the corresponding randomized classes in the multiple access model. In addition, we prove that there is no sparse hard set for NP under two-sided error randomized polynomial-time bounded truth-table reductions with confidence at least inversely polynomial unless NP=RP.

Cited by (0)

Most of the research was done while the author was funded as a Research Assistant of the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Partial support from the NSF through grant CCR 92-53582, from the European Union through Marie Curie Research Training Grant ERB-4001-GT-96-0783 while visiting CWI and the University of Amsterdam, and from the Fields Institute. E-mail: [email protected].