Regular Article
Petri Nets and Regular Processes

https://doi.org/10.1006/jcss.1999.1643Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

We consider the following problems: (a) Given a labelled Petri net and a finite automaton, are they equivalent?; (b) Given a labelled Petri net, is it equivalent to some (unspecified) finite automaton? These questions are studied within the framework of trace and bisimulation equivalences, in both their strong and weak versions. (In the weak version a special τ action—likened to an ε-move in automata theory—is considered to be nonobservable.) We demonstrate that (a) is decidable for strong and weak trace equivalence and for strong bisimulation equivalence, but undecidable for weak bisimulation equivalence. On the other hand, we show that (b) is decidable for strong bisimulation equivalence, and undecidable for strong and weak trace equivalence, as well as for weak bisimulation equivalence.

Cited by (0)

1

Partially supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic Grant 201/97/0456 and by a grant from the Swedish STINT Fellowship programme.

2

Partially supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich 342 of the DFG.

3

Partially supported by TFR Grant 221-98-103. Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].