Regular Article
Bridging the Information Transfer Gap: Measuring Goodness of Information Fit

https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1999.0128Get rights and content

Abstract

The ability to determine, a priori, how well an interface design meets the information needs of a user—that is, to ‘bridge the information transfer gap’—is a critical component of any intelligent interface design system. Yet most current approaches either sidestep the problem of computationally measuring ‘goodness of fit’ by compiling design knowledge into a set of pattern matching rules or, at best, use a very limited set of parameters in scoring. We describe a formal representation for capturing the information needs associated with user tasks and the information conveying capabilities of interface elements. A multifaceted scoring technique, using this representation, is presented for assessing a design's goodness of fit against current user requirements. The hallmarks of this approach are the explicit representation of the goals of good user interface design, evaluation of a proposed design against these goals and a computational approach to performing tradeoffs among these goals when incompatible. Finally, we report on the implementation and user acceptance of this design in an adaptive interface application for military attack/scout helicopters.

References (41)

  • C. Johnson

    Documenting the design of saftey-critical user interfaces

    Interacting with Computers

    (1996)
  • P. Johnson et al.

    Designing user interfaces from analyses of users' tasks

    (1997)
  • N. Geddes et al.

    Automatic display management using dynamic plans and events

    (1991)
  • M. Zhou et al.

    Top-down hierarchical planning of coherent visual discourse

    (1997)
  • P. Castells et al.

    Declarative models of presentation

    (1997)
  • C. Wickens

    Computational models of human performance

    CSERIAC Gateway

    (1992)
  • A. Andre, C. Wickens, 1991, A computational approach to display layout analysis, AAAI-91-2, NASA Ames Research Center,...
  • C. Miller

    Computational approaches to interface design; What works, what doesn't what should and what might

    (1997)
  • R. Opperman

    Adaptive User Support

    (1994)
  • K. Keller et al.

    Domain specific software design for decision aiding

    (1992)
  • P. Jones et al.

    Varieties of representational forms: towards designing and information infrastructure for an organization

    (1998)
  • C. Miller et al.

    Toward an integration of task- and work domain-based analysis techniques for interface design

    (1998)
  • D. Woods

    Paradigms for intelligent decision support

  • D. Woods

    The cognitive engineering of problem representations

  • J. Greeno

    Conceptual entities

  • W. Rouse et al.

    An architecture for intelligent interfaces: outline of an approach to supporting operators of complex systems

    Human-Computer Interaction

    (1987)
  • C. Mitchell et al.

    Use of model-based qualitative icons and adaptive windows in workstations for supervisory control systems

    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

    (1987)
  • L. Suchman

    Plans and Situated Actions: The Problems of Human Machine Communication

    (1987)
  • G. Klein et al.

    Decision Making in Action

    (1993)
  • G. Boy, 1999, Cognitive Function Analysis, Ablex, Stamford,...
  • Cited by (13)

    • Weaving semiotic engineering in meta-design: A case study analysis

      2017, Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Numerous hurdles and barriers rear up to make system design difficult [18,55]. The communication gap between designers and users has long been recognized as a major source of trouble [18,46,55,56], and today it became more critical than ever due to the widespread use of Web 2.0 applications, multi-modal interfaces, and end-user computing by people neither expert in software technologies nor interested in them. Users and designers generally possess distinct types of knowledge, and follow different approaches, processes, and reasoning strategies in modeling, performing, and documenting the tasks to be carried out in a given application domain.

    • An interaction fit analysis technique and its applications

      2014, AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report
    • Delegation and transparency: Coordinating interactions so information exchange is no surprise

      2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
    • Modeling information "Fit": A tool for interface design

      2011, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text