Rapid CommunicationAccess to Deductive Logic Depends on a Right Ventromedial Prefrontal Area Devoted to Emotion and Feeling: Evidence from a Training Paradigm
References (34)
- et al.
Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex
Nat. Neurosci.
(1999) - et al.
Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex
J. Neurosci.
(1998) - et al.
Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy
Science
(1997) - et al.
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Trends Cognit. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance
Science
(1998) Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
(1994)The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness
(1999)- et al.
The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient
Science
(1994) - et al.
Interference and Inhibition in Cognition
(1995) Rules for the Direction of the Mind
(1628/1961)
Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: Evidence from event-related fMRI studies
Exp. Brain Res.
Reasoning with negatives
Br. J. Psychol.
Biases in Human Reasoning
Matching bias in conditional reasoning
Thinking Reasoning
Spatial registration and normalization of images
Hum. Brain Mapp.
The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning
NeuroReport
Cited by (72)
Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain
2023, NeuroImageInhibitory control and the understanding of buoyancy from childhood to adulthood
2021, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Handling the marbles with hands could also be used as a pedagogical intervention to improve buoyancy judgment. Future studies should also investigate whether a metacognitive intervention centered on learning to identify the intuitive conception and to inhibit it, which has proven to be efficient in overcoming reasoning biases (Houdé et al., 2000, 2001; Lubin, Lanoë, Pineau, & Rossi, 2012; Rossi, Lubin, Lanoë, & Pineau, 2012), could improve scientific reasoning. The results of the current study are in line with previous findings (Potvin & Cyr, 2017; Potvin, Masson, et al., 2015), indicating that children and adolescents must inhibit their spontaneous intuitive conception that “bigger objects sink more” in order to correctly compare the buoyancy of objects in a context where the smaller object is denser.
Neurocognitive processes underlying heuristic and normative probability judgments
2020, CognitionCitation Excerpt :Brain imaging is a suitable complement to the encompassing behavioral literature regarding these issues, as the arguments for isolable judgment processes imply that they should be separable also in terms of underlying brain function (Evans & Stanovich, 2013; Keren & Schul, 2009). Although associative (Binder & Desai, 2011) and analytical (De Martino, Kumaran, Seymour, & Dolan, 2006; De Neys, Vartanian, & Goel, 2008; Houdé et al., 2001; Leroux et al., 2009; Mega, Gigerenzer, & Volz, 2015) thinking have been investigated with brain imaging methods before, neurophysiological evidence for the separation of the assumed processes is lacking (Evans & Stanovich, 2013). We therefore aimed to test core assumptions of dual-process theory using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while participants judged variations of the emblematic Linda example: (i) if the conjunction fallacy is due to attribute substitution to a representativeness heuristic, incorrect probability judgments should involve the same brain regions that underlie similarity judgments; (ii) if avoidance of the conjunction fallacy is governed by a separate process characterized by cognitive decoupling, then such judgments should involve a different or additional set of brain regions related to executive control (Evans & Stanovich, 2013).
Ethical views and considerations
2020, Handbook of Clinical NeurologyIs inhibition involved in overcoming a common physics misconception in mechanics?
2015, Trends in Neuroscience and EducationCitation Excerpt :The concept of inhibition is particularly interesting for science learning, especially with regard to students׳ misconceptions, because it could come into play when overcoming a bad response to select a good response [86]. Recently, some results indicated that inhibition would be involved in logical reasoning [20,44,45], in mathematical reasoning about perimeter and area [79], and during a classic Piagetian number conservation task [43]. For these specific tasks, it appears that the areas of the brain related to inhibition are more activated when participants are able to provide an accurate answer.
Framing deductive reasoning with emotional content: An fMRI study
2014, Brain and Cognition
- 1
To whom correspondence should be adressed at Groupe d'Imagerie Neurofonctionnelle (UMR 6095), Université Paris 5, Sorbonne, 46 Rue Saint-Jacques, 75005 Paris, France. Fax: 33 (0) 1 40 46 29 93. E-mail: [email protected].