Abstract
The classical analytic tableau method has been extended successfully to modal logics (see e.g. Fitting 1983; Fitting 1993; Goré 1992) and also to relevant and paraconsistent logics Bloesch 1993a; Bloesch 1993b. The classical connection method has been extended to modal and intuitionistic logics Wallen 1990, and the purpose of this paper is to investigate whether a similar adaptation to relevant logic is possible. A hybrid method is developed for B+, with a specific solution to the “multiplicity problem”, as in the technique of modal semantic diagrams introduced in Hughes and Cresswell 1968. Proofs of soundness and completeness are also given.
The authors thank Prof. Jean-Paul van Bendegem, editor of “Logique et Analyse”, for permission to reprint “Algorithms for Relevant Logic” which was published in Logique et Analyse, 150-151-152 Special issue dedicated to the memory of Léo Apostel, pp.329–346, 1995.
We are grateful to the research team of the Automated Reasoning Project of the Australian National University (Canberra) for their invaluable help. We are very grateful to Dr. Bloesch for granting us the permission to quote his Ph.D. thesis. We received substantial help from Dr. Goré and Dr. Lugardon. We also thank Dr. van der Does and Dr. Herzig. This work was supported by a grant of the F.N.R.S. (project 8.4536.94) and an earlier version was discussed at the Centenary Conference of the Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic (Nov. 1995). We express our gratitude to our sponsors and our hosts, and to Dr. Gailly and Mrs Gailly Goffaux for several corrections. We owe the topic of this paper to the late Prof. Sylvan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batens D. (2001). “A Dynamic Characterization of the Pure Logic of Relevant Implication”. Journal of philosophical logic 30:267–280.
Bloesch A. (1993). Signed Tableaux — A Basis for Automated Theorem Proving in non Classical Logics. PhD thesis, University of Queensland
____ (1993). “A Tableau Style Proof System for Two Paraconsistent Logics”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34:2, pp.295–301.
Fitting M. (1983). Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Dordrecht Reidel Publishing Company.
____ (1993). “Basic Modal Logic”, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming), Ed. by D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger and J. A. Robinson. Oxford Clarendon Press.
Goré R. (1992). Cut-free Sequent and Tableau Systems for Propositional Normal Logic. Technical report, Cambridge.
Gribomont E.P. & Rossetto D. (1995). CAVEAT: Technique and Tool for Computer Aided VErification And Transformation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 939, Computer Aided Verification. Springer.
Hughes G.E. & Cresswell M.J. (1968). An Introduction to Modal Logic. London Methuen and Co Ltd 1968, 1972.
Priest G. & Sylvan R. (1992). “Simplified Semantics for Basic Relevant Logics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 21:217–232.
Restall G. (1993). “Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals)”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 22:481–511.
Wallen L. (1990). Automated Proof Search in Non-classical Logics. Cambridge MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gochet, P., Gribomont, P., Rossetto, D. (2005). Algorithms for Relevant Logic. In: Vanderveken, D. (eds) Logic, Thought and Action. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2616-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3167-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)