Skip to main content

Algorithms for Relevant Logic

  • Chapter
Book cover Logic, Thought and Action

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 2))

  • 1297 Accesses

Abstract

The classical analytic tableau method has been extended successfully to modal logics (see e.g. Fitting 1983; Fitting 1993; Goré 1992) and also to relevant and paraconsistent logics Bloesch 1993a; Bloesch 1993b. The classical connection method has been extended to modal and intuitionistic logics Wallen 1990, and the purpose of this paper is to investigate whether a similar adaptation to relevant logic is possible. A hybrid method is developed for B+, with a specific solution to the “multiplicity problem”, as in the technique of modal semantic diagrams introduced in Hughes and Cresswell 1968. Proofs of soundness and completeness are also given.

The authors thank Prof. Jean-Paul van Bendegem, editor of “Logique et Analyse”, for permission to reprint “Algorithms for Relevant Logic” which was published in Logique et Analyse, 150-151-152 Special issue dedicated to the memory of Léo Apostel, pp.329–346, 1995.

We are grateful to the research team of the Automated Reasoning Project of the Australian National University (Canberra) for their invaluable help. We are very grateful to Dr. Bloesch for granting us the permission to quote his Ph.D. thesis. We received substantial help from Dr. Goré and Dr. Lugardon. We also thank Dr. van der Does and Dr. Herzig. This work was supported by a grant of the F.N.R.S. (project 8.4536.94) and an earlier version was discussed at the Centenary Conference of the Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic (Nov. 1995). We express our gratitude to our sponsors and our hosts, and to Dr. Gailly and Mrs Gailly Goffaux for several corrections. We owe the topic of this paper to the late Prof. Sylvan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batens D. (2001). “A Dynamic Characterization of the Pure Logic of Relevant Implication”. Journal of philosophical logic 30:267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloesch A. (1993). Signed Tableaux — A Basis for Automated Theorem Proving in non Classical Logics. PhD thesis, University of Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (1993). “A Tableau Style Proof System for Two Paraconsistent Logics”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34:2, pp.295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting M. (1983). Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Dordrecht Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____ (1993). “Basic Modal Logic”, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming), Ed. by D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger and J. A. Robinson. Oxford Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goré R. (1992). Cut-free Sequent and Tableau Systems for Propositional Normal Logic. Technical report, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribomont E.P. & Rossetto D. (1995). CAVEAT: Technique and Tool for Computer Aided VErification And Transformation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 939, Computer Aided Verification. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes G.E. & Cresswell M.J. (1968). An Introduction to Modal Logic. London Methuen and Co Ltd 1968, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest G. & Sylvan R. (1992). “Simplified Semantics for Basic Relevant Logics”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 21:217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall G. (1993). “Simplified Semantics for Relevant Logics (and some of their rivals)”, Journal of Philosophical Logic 22:481–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallen L. (1990). Automated Proof Search in Non-classical Logics. Cambridge MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gochet, P., Gribomont, P., Rossetto, D. (2005). Algorithms for Relevant Logic. In: Vanderveken, D. (eds) Logic, Thought and Action. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics