Skip to main content

Mathematical Modeling of the Relationship “between” Based On Morphological Operators

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Morphology: 40 Years On

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 30))

Abstract

The spatial relationship “between” is a notion which is intrinsically both fuzzy and contextual, and depends in particular on the shape of the objects. The few existing definitions do not take into account these aspects. We propose here definitions which are based on morphological operators and a fuzzy notion of visibility in order to model the main intuitive acceptions of the relation. We distinguish between cases where objects have similar spatial extensions and cases where one object is much more extended than the other. These definitions are illustrated on real data from brain images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Aiello and J. van Benthem. A Modal Walk Through Space. Journal of Applied Non Classical Logics, 12(3–4):319–364, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Bloch. Fuzzy Relative Position between Objects in Image Processing: a Morphological Approach. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 21(7):657–664, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Bloch. Mathematical Morphology and Spatial Relationships: Quantitative, Semi-Quantitative and Symbolic Settings. In L. Sztandera and P. Matsakis, editors, Applying Soft Computing in Defining Spatial Relationships, pages 63–98. Physica Verlag, Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Bloch, O. Colliot, and R. Cesar. Modélisation de la relation spatiale “entire” à partir de notions de convexité et de visibilité floue. In Rencontresfrancophones sur la Logique Floue et ses Applications LFA’04, pages 149–156, Nantes, France, nov 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I. Bloch and H. Maître. Fuzzy Mathematical Morphologies: A Comparative Study. Patttern Recognition, 28(9):1341–1387, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. U. Bodenhofer. Fuzzy “Between” Operators in the Framework of Fuzzy Orderings. In B. Bouchon-Meunier, L. Foulloy, and R. R. Yager, editors, Intelligent Systems for Information Processing: From Representation to Applications, pages 59–70. Elsevier, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O. Colliot, O. Camara, R. Dewynter, and I. Bloch. Description of Brain Internal Structures by Means of Spatial Relations for MR Image Segmentation. In SPIE Medical Imaging, volume 5370, pages 444–455, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O. Colliot, A. Tuzikov, R. Cesar, and I. Bloch. Approximate Reflectional Symmetries of Fuzzy Objects with an Application in Model-Based Object Recognition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 147:141–163, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Krishnapuram, J. M. Keller, and Y. Ma. Quantitative Analysis of Properties and Spatial Relations of Fuzzy Image Regions. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 1(3):222–233, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Landau and R. Jackendorff. “What” and “Where” in Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:217–265, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Larvor. Notion de méréogéométrie: description qualitative de propriétés géométriques, du movement et de laforme d’objets tridimensionnels. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Matheron. Random Sets and Integral Geometry. Wiley, New-York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Mathet. Etude de l’expression en langue de l’espace et du déplacement: analyse linguistique, modélisation cognitive, et leur expéerimentation informatique. PhD thesis, Université de Caen, France, December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Miyajima and A. Ralescu. Spatial Organization in 2D Segmented Images: Representation and Recognition of Primitive Spatial Relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 65:225–236, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Rosenfeld and R. Klette. Degree of Adjacency or Surroundness. Pattern Recognition, 18(2):169–177, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bloch, I., Colliot, O., Cesar, R.M. (2005). Mathematical Modeling of the Relationship “between” Based On Morphological Operators. In: Ronse, C., Najman, L., Decencière, E. (eds) Mathematical Morphology: 40 Years On. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3443-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3443-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3442-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3443-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics