Skip to main content

Abstract

Conversational recommender systems guide users through a product space, alternatively making concrete product suggestions and eliciting the user’s feedback. Critiquing is a common form of user feedback, where users provide limited feedback at the feature-level by constraining a feature’s value-space. For example, a user may request a cheaper product, thus critiquing the price feature. Usually, when critiquing is used in conversational recommender systems, there is little or no attempt to monitor successive critiques within a given recommendation session. In our experience this can lead to inefficiencies, on the part of the recommender system, and confusion on the part of the user. In this paper we describe an approach to critiquing that attempts to consider a user’s critiquing history, as well as their current critique, when making new recommendations. We provide experimental evidence to show that this has the potential to significantly improve recommendation efficiency.

This material is based on works supported by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. 03/IN.3/I361

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D.W. Aha, L.A. Breslow, and H. Muoz-Avila. Conversational case-based reasoning. Applied Intelligence, 14:9–32, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Burke, K. Hammond, and B. Young. Knowledge-based navigation of complex information spaces. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 462–468. AAAI Press/MIT Press, 1996. Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Burke, K. Hammond, and B.C. Young. The FindMe Approach to Assisted Browsing. Journal of IEEE Expert, 12(4):32–40, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Doyle and P. Cunningham. A Dynamic Approach to Reducing Dialog in On-Line Decision Guides. In E. Blanzieri and L. Portinale, editors, Proceedings of the 5th European Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning, (EWCBR-00), pages 49–60. Springer, 2000. Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. McCarthy, J. Reilly, L. McGinty, and B. Smyth. Thinking Positively-Explanatory Feedback for Conversational Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR-04) Explanation Workshop, 2004. Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. McGinty and B. Smyth. Comparison-Based Recommendation. In Susan Craw, editor, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR-02), pages 575–589. Springer, 2002. Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. McGinty and B. Smyth. The Role of Diversity in Conversational Recommender Systems. In D. Bridge and K. Ashley, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-03), pages 276–290. Springer, 2003. Troindheim, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. McGinty and B. Smyth. Tweaking Critiquing. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Personalization and Web Techniques at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), pages 20–27. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2003. Acapulco, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. McSherry. Minimizing dialog length in interactive case-based reasoning. In Bernhard Nebel, editor, Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-01), pages 993–998. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001. Seattle, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. McSherry. Diversity-Conscious Retrieval. In Susan Craw, editor, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR-02), pages 219–233. Springer, 2002. Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. McSherry. Similarity and Compromise. In D. Bridge and K. Ashley, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-03), pages 291–305. Springer-Verlag, 2003. Trondheim, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Reilly, K. McCarthy, L. McGinty, and B. Smyth. Dynamic Critiquing. In P.A. Gonzalez Calero and P. Funk, editors, Proceedings of the European Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR-04). Springer, 2004. Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Smyth and P. Cotter. A Personalized TV Listings Service for the Digital TV Age. Journal of Knowledge-Based Systems, 13(2–3):53–59, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Smyth and L. McGinty. An Analysis of Feedback Strategies in Conversational Recommender Systems. In P. Cunningham, editor, Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS-2003), pages 211–216, 2003. Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Smyth and L. McGinty. The Power of Suggestion. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), pages 127–138. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2003. Acapulco, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reilly, J., McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., Smyth, B. (2005). Incremental Critiquing. In: Bramer, M., Coenen, F., Allen, T. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXI. SGAI 2004. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-102-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-102-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-907-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-102-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics