Skip to main content

Finding the Best Partner: The PART-NET System

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1534))

Abstract

The issue as to whether computer simulation can be considered a valid tool for improving the predictive capacity of social scientific theories is still controversial (e.g., Troitzsch 1997 and Scott et al. 1997, seem to deny it). Instead, the role of computer simulation for testing models and experimenting on social phenomena is denied by no-one in the field (see Halpin 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chattoe, E., Gilbert, N.: A simulation of budgetary decision-making based on interview data. In: Paper presented at SimSoc 1995, University of Florida, Boca Raton, September 15-17 (1995) (in press); Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Simulating interdependence networks. A two-way approach to the micro-macro link. In: Troitzsch, K.G., Mueller, U., Gilbert, N., Doran, J. (eds.) Social Sience Microsimulation. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Tributes or norms? The context-dependent rationality of social control. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating social phenomena. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R., Sichman, J.: DEPNET: How to benefit from social dependence. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 20(2-3), 161–177 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, R. (1997). Diversity in strategies of partnership formation. Paper presented at the Dagstuhl Seminar on Social Science Microsimulation. Tools for Modeling, Parameter Optimization, and Sensitivity Analysis, Schloss Dagstuhl, May 1-5 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: Sour grapes. Studies in the sub-version of rationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmytrasiewicz, P.J.: On Reasoning About Other Agents. In: DIMAS1995 - Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Decentralized Intelligent and Multiagent Systems, Krakov, Poland, November 22, pp.I/38-49 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, B. (1997). Simulation in Sociology: A review of the literature. In: Paper read at the Workshop on Potential of the computer simulation for the social sciences, Centre for Research in the Social Sciences (CRESS), University of Surrey, January 14-15 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves-Heap, S.: Post-modernity and new conceptions of rationality in economics. In: Gerrard, B. (ed.) The economics of rationality. Routledge, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: Advances in understanding rational behavior. In: Moser, P.K. (ed.) Rationality in action. Contemporary approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, U.: On the resolution of conflict by compensation. In: Nell, E.J., Semmle, W. (eds.) Nicholas Kaldor and mainstream economics. Macmillan, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., Galanter, E., Pribram, K.H.: Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, P.K.: Rationality in action: general introduction. In: Moser, P.K. (ed.) Rationality in action. Contemporary approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S., Edmonds, B., Wallis, S.: Validation and Verification of Computational Models with Multiple Cognitive Agents, CPM Report No.: 97-25 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C., Demazeau, Y.: A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In: Cohn, A.G. (ed.) Proceedings of the 11th. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 188–192. John Wiley & Sons, Baffins Lane (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: Comment. In: VanLehn, K. (ed.) Architectures for intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I., Krause, U.: Goethe’s Faust, Arrow’s Possibility Theorem and the individual decision-taker. In: Elster, J. (ed.) The multiple self. Cambridge University Press. Elster, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Troitzsch, K.G.: Social science simulation - Origin, prospects, purposes. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds.) Simulating social phenomena. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneziano, V., Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: MICROdep The formation of partnerships. In: Paper presented at the Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Social Simulation (MASSIM 1996). University of Ulm, Germany (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Conte, R., Pedone, R. (1998). Finding the Best Partner: The PART-NET System. In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65476-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49246-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics