Skip to main content

Towards Modeling Other Agents: A Simulation-Based Study

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation (MABS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1534))

Abstract

In this paper, we present some of our ongoing experimental research towards investigating advantages of modeling other agents in multiagent environments. We attempt to quantify the value or utility of building models about other agents using no more than the observation of others’ behavior. We are interested in empirically showing that a modeler agent can take advantage of building and updating its beliefs about other agents. This advantage can make it perform better than an agent without modeling capabilities. We have been conducting a simulataion-based study using a competitive game called Meeting Scheduling Game as a testbed. First, we briefly describe our multiagent simultaion testbed. Then, we describe in detail our experimental study. We explore a range of strategies from least- to most-informed, and present some of our preliminary results on the relative performance of these strategies. Decreasing the a priori knowledge about the others and increasing the modeling capabilities we are able to define a series of “modeler” agents. Finally, we present a method for using probabilistic models about the others in such a way that the expected utility is maximized.

This research has been sponsored in part by ITESM and CONACYT in México and by NSF —grant number IRI-9508191— in USA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brena, R., Garrido, L.: The schedule game. Technical Report CIA-RI-026, Center for Artificial Intelligence, ITESM-Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L., México (September 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carmel, D., Markovitch, S.: Opponent modelling in a multi-agent systems. In: Weiss, G., Sen, S. (eds.) Lecture note in AI, 1042: Adaptation and Learning in Multi-agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI). Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sun Microsystems Inc. Copyright ©. All rights reserved. The source for java technology, http://java.sun.com/

  4. Davis, R., Smith, R.G.: Negotiation as a metahphor for distributed problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 63–109 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Decker, K., Sycara, K., Williamson, M.: Modeling information agents: Advertisements, organizational roles, and dynamic behavior. In: Working Notes of the AAAI-1996 workshop on Agent Modeling. AAAI Report WS-96-02. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Center for Design Research at Stanford University. Copyright ©. All rights reserved. Jatlite: Java agent template, lite, http://java.stanford.edu/

  7. Garrido, L., Brena, R.: The meeting scheduling game. Technical Report CIARI, Center for Artificial Intelligence, ITESM-Campus Monterrey, Monterrey, N.L., México (1998) (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garrido, L., Brena, R., Sycara, K.: Cognitive modelling and group adaptation in intelligent multi-agent meeting scheduling. In: Lematre, C. (ed.) First Iberoamerican Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence and Multiagent Systems, LANIA-UV, pp. 55–72 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garrido, L., Sycara, K.: Multi-agent meeting scheduling: Preliminary experimental results. In: Tokoro, M. (ed.) Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 95–102. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gmytrasiewicz, P.J.: On reasoning about other agents. In: Intelligent Agents II. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI), vol. 1037. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kautz, A., Allen, J.: Generalized plan recognition. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 32–37. AAAI press, Menlo Park (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mor, Y., Goldman, C., Rosenschein, J.: Learn your opponent’s strategy (in polynomial time)! In: Weiss, G., Sen, S. (eds.) Lecture note in AI, 1042: Adaptation and Learning in Multi-agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI). Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nadella, R., Sen, S.: Correlating internal parameters and external performance: Learning soccer agents. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence Meets Machine Learning - Learning in Multiagent Environments. LNCS (LNAI), pp. 137–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petrie, C.: Agent-based engineering, the web, and intelligence. IEEE Expert, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In: The Twelfth International Joint COnference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-1991 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenschein, J.S., Genesereth M.R.: Deals among rational agents. In: The Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. Artificial Intelligence Series. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sichman, J., Demazeau, Y., Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In: Cohn, A. (ed.) The 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-1994), pp. 188–192. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stone, C.M.: A Course in Probability and Statistics. Duxbury Press, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tambe, M., Rosenbloom, P.: Architectures for agents that track other agents in multi-agent worlds. In: Tambe, M., Müller, J., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) IJCAI-WS 1995 and ATAL 1995. LNCS, vol. 1037. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vidal, J.M., Durfee, E.H.: Using recursive agent models effectively. In: Tambe, M., Müller, J., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) IJCAI-WS 1995 and ATAL 1995. LNCS, vol. 1037. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Benefits of learning in negotiation. In: Fourteenth National Conference on AI, pp. 36–41. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garrido, L., Brena, R., Sycara, K. (1998). Towards Modeling Other Agents: A Simulation-Based Study. In: Sichman, J.S., Conte, R., Gilbert, N. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. MABS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1534. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10692956_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65476-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49246-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics