Skip to main content

Least Commitment on Variable Binding in Presence of Incomplete Knowledge

  • Conference paper
Book cover Recent Advances in AI Planning (ECP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1809))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Constraint Satisfaction techniques have been recognized to be effective tools for increasing the efficiency of least commitment planners. We focus on least commitment on variable binding. A constraint based approach for this issue has been previously proposed by Yang and Chan [21]. In this setting, the planning problem is mapped onto a Constraint Satisfaction Problem. Its variables represent domain objects and are defined on a finite domain of values; constraints remove inconsistent values from variable domains through constraint propagation. In many applications, however, it is not always convenient, if possible at all, to know in advance all objects belonging to variable domains. Thus, domain values should be retrieved during the plan construction only when needed. The interesting point is that data acquisition for each variable can be guided by the constraint (or the constraints) imposed on the variable itself, in order to retrieve only consistent values. For this purpose, we have extended a Partial Order Planner performing least commitment on variable binding. This extension can cope with incomplete knowledge. We use the Interactive Constraint Satisfaction framework defined in [12] in order to exploit the efficiency deriving from constraint propagation and the possibility of acquiring the domain knowledge during the plan construction. Experimental results and comparisons with related approaches show the effectiveness of the proposed technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashish, N., Knoblock, C.A., Levy, A.: Information gathering plans with sensing actions. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Planning (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cucchiara, R., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Milano, M., Piccardi, M.: Extending CLP(FD) with interactive data acquisition for 3d visual object recognition. In: Proceedings of PACLP 1999, pp. 137–155 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ECRC. ECLiPSe User Manual Release 3.3 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Etzioni, O., Levy, H., Segal, R., Thekkath, C.: Os agents: Using ai techniques in the operating system environment. Technical report, University of Washington (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Golden, K.: Planning and Knowledge Representation for Softbots. PhD thesis, University of Washington (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golden, K., Etzioni, O., Weld, D.: Xii: Planning with universal quantification and incomplete information. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 1994 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Golden, K., Weld, D.: Representing sensing actions: The middle ground revisited. In: Proceedings of 5th Int. Conf. on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Hentenryck, P.: Constraint Satisfaction in Logic Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joslin, D.: Passive and Active Decision Postponement in Plan Generation. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kambhampati, S.: Using disjunctive orderings instead of conflict resolution in partial order planning. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Arizona State University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kwock, C.T., Weld, D.S.: Planning to gather information. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lamma, E., Milano, M., Mello, P., Cucchiara, R., Gavanelli, M., Piccardi, M.: Constraint propagation and value acquisition: why we should do it interactively. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI (1999) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lever, J., Richards, B.: parcplan: a planning architecture with parallel actions, resources and constraints. In: Proceedings of 8th ISMIS (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McAllester, D., Rosenblitt, D.: Systematic nonlinear planning. In: Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on AI, Anaheim, CA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mittal, S., Falkenhainer, B.: Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1990 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Olawsky, D., Gini, M.: Deferred planning and sensor use. In: Proceedings DARPA Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling, and Control (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pryor, E., Collins, P.: Planning for contingencies: A decision-based approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 4, 287–339 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tate, A., Drabble, B., Dalton, J.: Reasoning with constraints within o-plan2. Technical report, AI Applications Institute Univeristy of Edinburgh (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weld, D.S.: An introduction to least commitment planning. AI Magazine 15, 27–61 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, Q.: A theory of conflict resolution in planning. Artificial Intelligence 58, 361–392 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, Q., Chan, A.Y.M.: Delaying variable binding commitments in planning. In: The 2nd International Conference on AI Planning Systems, AIPS (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Barruffi, R., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Milano, M. (2000). Least Commitment on Variable Binding in Presence of Incomplete Knowledge. In: Biundo, S., Fox, M. (eds) Recent Advances in AI Planning. ECP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1809. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10720246_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44657-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics