Abstract
The meaning of a communicative act in a multi-agent system can be characterised at a number of different levels. We argue that only one level of meaning is common across all applications: what we call the action-level semantics given by protocols or conversation policies. We define a general semantic framework for specifying the semantics of a class of Agent Communication Languages (ACLs) based on protocols. We then introduce sACL, a small ACL, and show how the action-level semantics of this language can be integrated with an intentional semantics. This enables us to specify the meaning of an individual communicative act in the context of the conversation in which it occurs, and to customise sACL for different application domains. We describe a development method for defining an ACL for a particular application, and give a reference architecture for the method using the Beliefs-Desires-Intentions (BDI) agent architecture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bradshaw, J., Dutfield, S., Benoit, P., Woolley, J.: KAoS: Toward an industrial-strength open agent architecture. In: Bradshaw, J. (ed.) Software Agents. AAAI/MIT Press (1997)
FIPA. FIPA 1997 specification part 2: Agent communication language. FIPA (Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents) (1997), http://drogo.cselt.stet.it/fipa/
Galliers, J.: Autonomous belief revision and communication. In: Gardenfors, P. (ed.) Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Kinny, D., Georgeff, M., Bailey, J., Kemp, D., Ramamohanarao, K.: Active databases and agent systems: A comparison. In: Proceedings SecondInternational Rules in Database Systems Workshop (1995)
Kuwabara, K., Ishida, T., Osato, N.: AgenTalk: Describing multiagent coordination protocols with inheritance. In: Proc. 7th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 1995), pp. 460–465 (1995)
Labrou, Y., Finin, T.: Semantics and conversations for an agent communication language. In: Huhns, M., Singh, M. (eds.) Readings in Agents, pp. 235–242. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)
Pitt, J., Anderton, M., Cunningham, J.: Normalized interactions between autonomous agents: A case study in inter-organizational project management. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 5, 201–222 (1996)
Pitt, J., Prouskas, K.: Initial specification of multi-agent system for realisation of load control and overload protection strategy. MARINER Project (EU ACTS AC333) Deliverable D3 (1998), http://www.teltec.dcu.ie/mariner
Smith, I., Cohen, P., Bradshaw, J., Greaves, M., Holmback, H.: Designingconversation policies using joint intention theory. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings ICSMAS 1998. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)
Singh, M.: Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer, 40–47 (1998)
Wooldridge, M.: Verifiable semantics for agent communication languages. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings ICMAS 1998. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pitt, J., Mamdani, A. (2000). Communication Protocols in Multi-agent Systems: A Development Method and Reference Architecture. In: Dignum, F., Greaves, M. (eds) Issues in Agent Communication. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1916. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/10722777_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/10722777_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41144-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-40028-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive