Skip to main content

Comparison of Global Optimization Methods for Drag Reduction in the Automotive Industry

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2005 (ICCSA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3483))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Various global optimization methods are compared in order to find the best strategy to solve realistic drag reduction problems in the automotive industry. All the methods consist in improving classical genetic algorithms, either by coupling them with a deterministic descent method or by incorporating a fast but approximated evaluation process. The efficiency of these methods (called HM and AGA respectively) is shown and compared, first on analytical test functions, then on a drag reduction problem where the computational time of a GA is reduced by a factor up to 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Muyl, F., Dumas, L., Herbert, V.: Hybrid method for aerodynamic shape optimization in automotive industry. Computers and Fluids 33, 849–858 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Poloni, C.: Hybrid GA for multi objective aerodynamic shape optimization. In: Genetic algorithms in engineering and computer science, vol. 33, pp. 397–415. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Renders, J.M., Flasse, S.P.: Hybrid methods using genetic algorithms for global optimization. IEEE Transactions on systems, man and cybernetics 26, 243–258 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vicini, A., Quagliarella, D.: Airfoil and wing design through hybrid optimization strategies. AIAA paper (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ong, Y.S., Nair, P.B., Keane, A.J., Wong, K.W.: Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Optimization Frameworks for High-Fidelity Engineering Design Problems. In: Knowledge Incorporation in Evolutionary Computation. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing Series, pp. 307–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jin, Y.: A survey on fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Journal of Soft Computing 9, 3–12 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 481–494 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ong, Y.S., Nair, P.B., Keane, A.J.: Evolutionary Optimization of Computationally Expensive Problems via Surrogate Modeling. AIAA Journal 41, 687–696 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giannakoglou, K.C.: Acceleration of GA using neural networks, theoretical background. GA for optimization in aeronautics and turbomachinery. VKI Lecture Series (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Muyl, F.: Méthode d’optimisation hybrides: application à l’optimisation de formes arodynamiques automobiles. Phd thesis Université Paris 6 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sagi, C.J., Han, T., Hammond, D.C.: Optimization of bluff body for minimum drag in ground proximity. AIAA paper (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dumas, L., Herbert, V., Muyl, F. (2005). Comparison of Global Optimization Methods for Drag Reduction in the Automotive Industry. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2005. ICCSA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11424925_99

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11424925_99

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25863-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32309-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics