Abstract
Entrusted undeniable signatures are like undeniable signatures, except that the disavowal protocol can only be run by a court in order to resolve a formal dispute. This paper introduces threshold entrusted undeniable signature scheme without trusted center. It is shown how the power to run a disavowal protocol of entrusted undeniable signature can be distributed to n agents such that any t of these can verify a signature. This facility is useful to solve “lie detector” problem of undeniable signatures.
This work was supported by the University IT Research Center Project funded by the Korean Ministry of Information and Communication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chaum, D., Antwerpen, H.V.: Undeniable signature. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 212–216. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)
Chaum, D.: Zero-knowledge undeniable signature. In: Damgård, I.B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1990. LNCS, vol. 473, pp. 458–464. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Boyar, J., Chaum, D., Damgard, I., Pedersen, T.P.: Convertible undeniable signature. In: Menezes, A., Vanstone, S.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 1990. LNCS, vol. 537, pp. 189–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Chaum, D.: Designated Confirmer Signatures. In: De Santis, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1994. LNCS, vol. 950, pp. 86–91. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Kim, S., Park, S., Won, D.: Nominative signatures. In: Proc. of ICEIC 1995, International Conference on Electronics, Informations and Communications, August 7-12, pp. II-68-II-71 (1995)
Kim, S., Park, S., Won, D.: Zero-knowledge nominative signatures. In: Proc. of PragoCrypt 1996, International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptology, September 30 - October 3, pp. 380–392 (1996)
Huang, Z., Wang, Y.: Convertible Nominative Signatures. In: Wang, H., Pieprzyk, J., Varadharajan, V. (eds.) ACISP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3108, pp. 348–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Park, S., Lee, K., Won, D.: An entrusted undeniable signature. In: Proc. of JW-ISC 1995, Korea-Japan Joint Workshop on Information Security and Cryptology, pp. 120–126 (1995)
Park, S., Kim, T., An, Y., Won, D.: A provably entrusted undeniable signature. In: Proc. of IEEE SICON/ICIE 1995, IEEE Singapore International Conference on Network/International Conference on Information Engineering, pp. 644–648 (1995)
Schneier, B.: Applied Cryptography, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1996)
Stadler, M.: Publicly verifiable secret sharing. In: Maurer, U.M. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1070, pp. 190–199. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Pedersen, T.P.: Distributed provers with applications to undeniable signatures. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 221–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Pedersen, T.P.: A threshold cryptosystem without a trusted party. In: Davies, D.W. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1991. LNCS, vol. 547, pp. 522–526. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, S., Won, D. (2005). Threshold Entrusted Undeniable Signature. In: Park, Cs., Chee, S. (eds) Information Security and Cryptology – ICISC 2004. ICISC 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3506. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11496618_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11496618_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26226-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32083-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)