Skip to main content

Spatial Reasoning Based on Rules

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3561))

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the problem of checking consistency in a hybrid formalism, which combines two essential formalisms in qualitative spatial reasoning: topological formalism and cardinal direction formalism. Although much work has been done in developing composition tables for these formalisms, the previous research for integrating heterogeneous formalisms was not sufficient. Instead of using conventional composition tables, we investigate the interactions between topological and cardinal directional relations with the aid of rules that are used efficiently in many research fields such as content-based image retrieval. These rules are shown to be sound, i.e. the deductions are logically correct. Based on these rules, an improved constraint propagation algorithm is introduced to enforce the path consistency. The results of computational complexity of checking consistency for constraint satisfaction problems based on various subsets of this hybrid formalism are presented at the end of this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gerevini, A., Renz, J.: Combining Topological and Size Constraints for Spatial Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) 137(1-2), 1–42 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Isli, A., Haarslev, V., Moller, R.: Combining cardinal direction relations and relative orientation relations in Qualitative Spatial Reasoning. Fachbereich Informatik, University Hamburg, Technical report FBI-HH-M-304/01 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, J.: Integrated spatial reasoning in geographic information systems: combining topology and direction. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Spatial Information Science and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Prasad Sistla, A., Yu, C.T., Haddad, R.: Reasoning About Spatial Relations in Picture Retrieval Systems. In: 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 570–581. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egenhofer, M.: A Formal Definition of Binary Topological Relations. In: Litwin, W., Schek, H.-J. (eds.) FODO 1989. LNCS, vol. 367, pp. 457–472. Springer, Heidelberg (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randell, D., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W. (eds.) Proc. of the Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165–176. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal, R., Egenhofer, M.: Cardinal Directions between Extended Spatial Objects. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (to be published) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Skiadopoulos, S., Koubarakis, M.: Composing cardinal direction relations. Artificial Intelligence 152(2), 143–171 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Randell, D.A., Cohn, A.G., Cui, Z.: Computing Transitivity Tables: A Challenge For Automated Theorem Provers. In: 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction, pp. 786–790. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cicerone, S., Di Felice, P.: Cardinal directions between spatial objects: the pairwise-consistency problem. Information Sciences 164, 165–188 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad Sistla, A., Yu, C.T., Haddad, R.: Reasoning About Spatial Relations in Picture Retrieval Systems. International Journal on Very Large Databases (VLDB) 3(4), 570–581 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Renz, J., Nebel, B.: On the Complexity of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: A Maximal Tractable Fragment of the Region Connection Calculus. Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) 108(1-2), 69–123 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Renz, J.: Maximal Tractable Fragments of the Region Connection Calculus: A Complete Analysis. In: 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), Stockholm, Sweden, August 1999, pp. 448–455 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Skiadopoulos, S., Koubarakis, M.: Qualitative spatial reasoning with cardinal directions. In: 7th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programing (CP 2002). LNCS, vol. 2470, pp. 341–355. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, H., Li, W. (2005). Spatial Reasoning Based on Rules. In: Mira, J., Álvarez, J.R. (eds) Mechanisms, Symbols, and Models Underlying Cognition. IWINAC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3561. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11499220_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11499220_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26298-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31672-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics