Abstract
Information fusion has, in the form of multiple classifier systems, long been a successful tool in pattern recognition applications. It is also becoming increasingly popular in biomedical image analysis, for example in computer-aided diagnosis and in image segmentation. In this paper, we extend the principles of multiple classifier systems by considering information fusion of classifier inputs rather than on their outputs, as is usually done. We introduce the distinction between combination of data (i.e., classifier inputs) vs. combination of interpretations (i.e., classifier outputs). We illustrate the two levels of information fusion using four different biomedical image analysis applications that can be implemented using fusion of either data or interpretations: atlas-based image segmentation, “average image” tissue classification, multi-spectral classification, and deformation-based group morphometry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Xu, L., Krzyzak, A., Suen, C.Y.: Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 22, 418–435 (1992)
Kittler, J., Hatef, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 20, 226–239 (1998)
De Santo, M., Molinara, M., Tortorella, F., Vento, M.: Automatic classification of clustered microcalcifications by a multiple expert system. Pattern Recognit 36, 1467–1477 (2003)
Rogova, G.L., Stomper, P.C.: Information fusion approach to microcalcification characterization. Inform. Fusion 3, 91–102 (2002)
Sboner, A., Eccher, C., Blanzieri, E., Bauer, P., Cristofolini, M., Zumiani, G., Forti, S.: A multiple classifier system for early melanoma diagnosis. Artif. Intell. Med. 27, 29–44 (2003)
Gefen, S., Tretiak, O.J., Piccoli, C.W., et al.: ROC analysis of ultrasound tissue characterization classifiers for breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22, 170–177 (2003)
Miller, M.I., Christensen, G.E., Amit, Y., Grenander, U.: Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90, 11944–11948 (1993)
Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer Jr., C.R.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 21, 1428–1442 (2004)
Maes, F., Collignon, A., Vandermeulen, D., Marchal, G., Suetens, P.: Multimodality image registration by maximisation of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16, 187–198 (1997)
Rohlfing, T., Maurer Jr., C.R.: Multi-classifier framework for atlas-based image segmentation. Pattern Recogn. Lett. (2005) (in press)
Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., et al.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18, 712–721 (1999)
Rohlfing, T., Maurer Jr., C.R.: Nonrigid image registration in shared-memory multiprocessor environments with application to brains, breasts, and bees. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 7, 16–25 (2003)
Guimond, A., Meunier, J., Thirion, J.P.: Average brain models: A convergence study. Comput. Vision Image Understanding 77, 192–210 (2000)
Collins, D.L., Zijdenbos, A.P., Kollokian, V., et al.: Design and construction of a realistic digital brain phantom. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 17, 463–468 (1998)
Park, H.J., Westin, C.F., Kubicki, et al.: White matter hemisphere asymmetries in healthy subjects and in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensorMRI study. NeuroImage 23, 213–223 (2004)
Brandt, R., Rohlfing, T., Ryback, J., et al.: An average three-dimensional atlas of the honeybee brain based on confocal images of 20 subjects. J. Comp. Neurol (2005) (in press)
Pfefferbaum, A., Lim, K.O., Desmond, J.E., Sullivan, E.V.: Thinning of the corpus callosum in older alcoholic men: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 20, 752–757 (1996)
Pfefferbaum, A., Rosenbloom, M., Serventi, K.L., Sullivan, E.V.: Corpus callosum, pons, and cortical white matter in alcoholic women. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 26, 400–406 (2002)
Smith, S.M.: Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum. Brain Map. 17, 143–155 (2002)
Studholme, C., Cardenas, V., Blumenfeld, R., et al.: Deformation tensor morphometry of semantic dementia with quantitative validation. NeuroImage 21, 1387–1398 (2004)
Rueckert, D., Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A.: Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 22, 1014–1025 (2003)
Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hiddenMarkov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 20, 45–57 (2001)
Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med. Phys. 24, 25–35 (1997)
Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognit 32, 71–86 (1999)
Chung, M.K., Worsley, K.J., Paus, T., et al.: A unified statistical approach to deformationbased morphometry. NeuroImage 14, 595–606 (2001)
Studholme, C., Cardenas, V., Maudsley, A., Weiner, M.: An intensity consistent filtering approach to the analysis of deformation tensor derived maps of brain shape. NeuroImage 19, 1638–1649 (2003)
Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Maurer Jr., C.R., Menzel, R.: Bee brains, B-splines and computational democracy: Generating an average shape atlas. In: Staib, L. (ed.) IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, Kauai, HI, pp. 187–194. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rohlfing, T., Pfefferbaum, A., Sullivan, E.V., Maurer, C.R. (2005). Information Fusion in Biomedical Image Analysis: Combination of Data vs. Combination of Interpretations. In: Christensen, G.E., Sonka, M. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3565. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11505730_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11505730_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26545-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31676-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)