Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Two Novel Predictor Set Scoring Methods

  • Conference paper
  • 1306 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3578))

Abstract

Due to the large number of genes measured in a typical microarray dataset, feature selection plays an essential role in tumor classification. In turn, relevance and redundancy are key components in determining the optimal predictor set. However, a third component – the relative weights given to the first two also assumes an equal, if not greater importance in feature selection. Based on this third component, we developed two novel feature selection methods capable of producing high, unbiased classification accuracy in multiclass microarray dataset. In an in-depth analysis comparing the two methods, the optimal values of the relative weights are also estimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hall, M.A., Smith, L.A.: Practical feature subset selection for machine learning. In: McDonald, C. (ed.) Proc. of the 21st Australasian Computer Science Conference, pp. 181–191. Springer, Singapore (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ding, C., Peng, H.: Minimum Redundancy Feature Selection from Microarray Gene Expression Data. In: Proc. 2nd IEEE Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, pp. 523–529. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knijnenburg, T.A.: Selecting relevant and non-redundant features in microarray classification applications. M.Sc. Thesis. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science (EEMCS) of the Delft University of Technology (2004), http://ict.ewi.tudelft.nl/pub/marcel/Knij05b.pdf

  4. Dudoit, S., Fridlyand, J., Speed, T.: Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. JASA 97, 77–87 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, L., Liu, H.: Efficiently Handling Feature Redundancy in High-Dimensional Data. In: Domingos, P., Faloutsos, C., Senator, T., Kargupta, H., Getoor, L. (eds.) Proc. of the 9th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 685–690. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambroise, C., McLachlan, G.J.: Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 6562–6566 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Platt, J.C., Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J.: Large Margin DAGs for Multiclass Classification. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 12, pp. 547–553 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramaswamy, S., Tamayo, P., Rifkin, R., Mukherjee, S., Yeang, C.H., Angelo, M., Ladd, C., Reich, M., Latulippe, E., Mesirov, J.P., Poggio, T., Gerald, W., Loda, M., Lander, E.S., Golub, T.R.: Multi-class cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 15149–15154 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rifkin, R., Mukherjee, S., Tamayo, P., Ramaswamy, S., Yeang, C.H., Angelo, M., Reich, M., Poggio, T., Lander, E.S., Golub, T.R., Mesirov, J.P.: An Analytical Method for Multiclass Molecular Cancer Classification. SIAM Review 45(4), 706–723 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Linder, R., Dew, D., Sudhoff, H., Theegarten, D., Remberger, K., Poppl, S.J., Wagner, M.: The Subsequent Artificial Neural Network (SANN) Approach Might Bring More Classificatory Power To ANN-based DNA Microarray Analyses. Bioinformatics Advance Access. Published on July 29, Bioinformatics (2004), doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth441

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ooi, C.H., Chetty, M. (2005). A Comparative Study of Two Novel Predictor Set Scoring Methods. In: Gallagher, M., Hogan, J.P., Maire, F. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2005. IDEAL 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3578. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508069_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26972-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31693-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics