Skip to main content

Conditional Deduction Under Uncertainty

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3571))

Abstract

Conditional deduction in binary logic basically consists of deriving new statements from an existing set of statements and conditional rules. Modus Ponens, which is the classical example of a conditional deduction rule, expresses a conditional relationship between an antecedent and a consequent. A generalisation of Modus Ponens to probabilities in the form of probabilistic conditional inference is also well known. This paper describes a method for conditional deduction with beliefs which is a generalisation of probabilistic conditional inference and Modus Ponens. Meaningful conditional deduction requires a degree of relevance between the antecedent and the consequent, and this relevance can be explicitly expressed and measured with our method. Our belief representation has the advantage that it is possible to represent partial ignorance regarding the truth of statements, and is therefore suitable to model typical real life situations. Conditional deduction with beliefs thereby allows partial ignorance to be included in the analysis and deduction of statements and hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schieux, M.C.: On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of of NMR Workshop, Whistler, Canada (June 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calabrese, P.G.: Reasoning with Uncertainty using Conditional Logic and Probability. In: Ayyub, B.M. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis, pp. 682–688. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz, M.R.: Topics in the Logic of Relevance. Philosophia Verlag, München (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Bipolarity in reasoning and decision - An introduction. The case of the possibility theory framework. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty (IPMU 2004), July 2004, Springer, Perugia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn, J.K., Restall, G.: Relevance Logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophicla Logic, 2nd edn., vol. 6, pp. 1–128. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman, I.R., Nguyen, H.T., Mahler, R.: The Mathematics of Data Fusion. In: Theory and Decision Library, Series B, Mathematical and Statistical Methods, vol. 37. Kluwer Press, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jøsang, A.: A Logic for Uncertain Probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(3), 279–311 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jøsang, A., Grandison, T.: Conditional Inference in Subjective Logic. In: Wang, X. (ed.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Fusion (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jøsang, A., McAnally, D., Pope, S.: Interpreting Bipolar Beliefs as Probability Density Functions Fuzzy Sets and Systems (2005) (Submitted to), Working paper at, http://security.dstc.edu.au/staff/ajosang/papers.html

  10. Lewis, D.: Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities. The Philosophical Review 85(3) (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McAnally, D., Jøsang, A.: Addition and Subtraction of Beliefs. In: Proceedings of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2004), July 2004, Perugia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsey, F.: The foundations of mathematics, and other logical essays. In: Braithwaite, R.B. (ed.), Paul, Trench and Trubner, Humanities Press, New York (1931); Reprinted 1950

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Smets, P.: Belief Functions. In: Smets, P., et al. (eds.) Non-Standard Logics for Automated Reasoning, pp. 253–286. Academic Press, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stalnaker, R.: Probability and conditionals. In: Harper, W.L., Stalnaker, R., Pearce, G. (eds.) The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, pp. 107–128. D.Riedel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1981)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jøsang, A., Pope, S., Daniel, M. (2005). Conditional Deduction Under Uncertainty. In: Godo, L. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3571. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31888-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics