Skip to main content

Using Similarity to Infer Meta-cognitive Behaviors During Analogical Problem Solving

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3538))

Abstract

We present a computational framework designed to provide adaptive support aimed at triggering learning from problem-solving activities in the presence of worked-out examples. The key to the framework’s ability to provide this support is a user model that exploits a novel classification of similarity to infer the impact of a particular example on a given student’s metacognitive behaviors and subsequent learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleven, V., Ashley, K.D.: Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples: Empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education, Kobe, Japan (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, R., Derry, S., Renkl, A., Wortham, D.: Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research 70(2), 181–214 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R.: Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13, 145–182 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R.: Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science 5, 121–152 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chi, M.T.H., VanLehn, K.: The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1, 69–105 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 371–417 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Conati, C., VanLehn, K.: Toward Computer-based Support of Meta-cognitive Skills: A Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 389–415 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, C., VanLehn, K.: DT Tutor: A decision-theoretic dynamic approach for optimal selection of tutorial actions. In: 5’th Int. Conf. on ITS, Montreal, Canada (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Novick, L.R.: Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14, 510–520 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quilici, J., Mayer, R.: Role of Examples in How students Learn to Categorize Statistics Word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(1), 144–161 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reed, S.K.: A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 13, 124–139 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reed, S.K., Dempster, A., Ettinger, M.: Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 11, 106–125 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweller, J., Cooper, G.A.: The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2(1), 59–89 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. VanLehn, K.: Analogy Events: How Examples are Used During Problem Solving. Cognitive Science 22(3), 347–388 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. VanLehn, K.: Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8(1), 71–125 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. VanLehn, K., Jones, R.M.: Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly. In: Utgoff, P.E. (ed.) Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weber, G.: Individual Selection of Examples in an Intelligent Learning Environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(1), 3–33 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muldner, K., Conati, C. (2005). Using Similarity to Infer Meta-cognitive Behaviors During Analogical Problem Solving. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrovic, A. (eds) User Modeling 2005. UM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3538. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11527886_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27885-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31878-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics