Skip to main content

New Quality Measures for Multiobjective Programming

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3611))

Abstract

In the case of multiobjective evolutionary algorithm, the outcome is usually an approximation of the true Pareto Optimal set and how to evaluate the quality of the approximation of the Pareto-optimal set is very important. In this paper, improved measures are carried out to the approximation, uniformity and well extended for the approximation of the Pareto optimal set with the advantage of easy to operate. Finally, we apply our measures to the four multiobjective evolutionary algorithms that are representative of the state-of-the-art on the standard functions. Results indicate that the measures are highly competitive and can be conducted to the comparisons of the approximation set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zitzler, E.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland (November 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leung, Y.W., Wang, Y.P.: U-Measure: a Quality Measure for Multiobjective Programming. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern. A 33(3), 337–343 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishibuchi, H., Murata, T.: A Multiobjective Genetic Local Search Algorithm and its Application to Flowshop Scheduling. IEEE Trans. Sys. Man Cybern, C 28, 392–403 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Veldhuizen D.A., lamont, G.B.: Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Research: A history and analysis. Dept. Elec. Comput. Eng., Graduate School of Eng., Air Force Inst. Technol., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Tech. Rep. TR-98-03 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zitzler, Thiele: Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Trans. On Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schott, J.R.: Fault tolerant design using single and multicriteria genetic algorithm optimization. M.S. thesis, Dept. Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA (May 1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Meng, Hy., Zhang, Xh., Liu, Sy. (2005). New Quality Measures for Multiobjective Programming. In: Wang, L., Chen, K., Ong, Y.S. (eds) Advances in Natural Computation. ICNC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3611. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11539117_143

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11539117_143

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28325-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31858-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics