Skip to main content

Logical Reconstruction of RDF and Ontology Languages

  • Conference paper
Book cover Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning (PPSWR 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3703))

Abstract

In this sketchy paper we introduce a logical reconstruction of the RDF family of languages and the OWL-DL family of languages. We prove that our logical framework is equivalent to the standard W3C definitions of RDF and OWL-DL/Lite. The main aim is to have a unified model theoretic semantics for both worlds. As a consequence we get various complexity results and a model theoretic semantics for basic SPARQL.

This work has been partially supported by the EU projects KnowledgeWeb, Interop, Tones, Sekt, and Asg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, W., Kifer, M., Warren, D.: HILOG: a foundation for higher-order logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming 15(3), 187–230 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C., Mendelzon, A.: Foundations of semantic web databases. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGART SIGMOD SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2004) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hayes, P.: RDF semantics. Technical report, W3C, W3C recommendation (February 2004), URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/

  5. Pan, J., Horrocks, I.: RDFS(FA) and RDF MT: Two semantics for RDFS. In: Fensel, D., Sycara, K., Mylopoulos, J. (eds.) ISWC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2870, pp. 30–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. Technical report, W3C, W3C recommendation (February 2004) URL http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/

  7. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL query language for RDF. Technical report, W3C, W3C working draft (April 2005), URL http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Bruijn, J., Franconi, E., Tessaris, S. (2005). Logical Reconstruction of RDF and Ontology Languages. In: Fages, F., Soliman, S. (eds) Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. PPSWR 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3703. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11552222_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11552222_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28793-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32028-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics