Skip to main content

Abstract

The philosophical roots of the Belief-Desire-Intention model lie in Bratman’s formulation of an intention theory of planning, in which he sought to make sense of the notion of future-directed intention. Implementations of BDI mainly follow the original Procedural Reasoning System model. BDI has a sound logical basis, exemplified by the Logic Of Rational Agents. While the LORA formulation has a temporal logic component, however, this does not translate into any ability for the agent to reason about actual time. Being able to reason about actual time would bring significant benefits for BDI agents, such as the ability for agents to communicate deadlines and to plan and schedule activities in a cooperating group. Given a suitable representation of temporal knowledge, an agent could learn about the temporal aspects of its own actions and processes, and this knowledge could be used as input to the planning process. This paper outlines a possible implementation strategy for the representation of, and the capacity to reason about, actual time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F.: Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence 23(2), 123–154 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, J.F.: Planning as Temporal Reasoning. In: Allen, J.F., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), Morgan Kaufman, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. AOS: JACK Intelligent Agents: JACK Manual, Release 4.1, Agent Oriented Software, Pty Ltd (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. AOS: JACK Intelligent Agents: JACK Teams Manual, Release 4.1, Agent Oriented Software, Pty Ltd (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Busetta, P., Howden, N., et al.: Structuring BDI Agents in Functional Clusters. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1757, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–256 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. d’Inverno, M., Kinny, D., et al.: A Formal Specification of dMARS. In: Rao, A., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1365, Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: “Sometimes” and “not ever” revisited: on branching time versus linear time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D.M.: Modal and Temporal Logic Programming. In: Temporal Logics and their Applications, pp. 197–237. Academic Press, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Galton, A.: Temporal Logic and Computer Science: An Overview. In: Galton, A. (ed.) Temporal Logics and their Applications, pp. 1–52. Academic Press, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Georgeff, M.P., Lansky, A.L.: Procedural Knowledge. Proceedings of the IEEE 74, 1383–1398 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Georgeff, M.P., Pollack, M.E.: Rational Agency Project. CSLI Monthly 2(3) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howden, N., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: JACK Intelligent Agents - Summary of an Agent Infrastructure. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Canada (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huber, M.: JAM: A BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 1999), pp. 236–243. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvis, B.: Expressing Commitment in a BDI Architecture (in review)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jennings, N.R.: Specification and implementation of a belief-desire-joint-intention architecture for collaborative problem solving. Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems 2(3), 289–318 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jonker, C.M., Terziyan, V., Treur, J.: Temporal and Spatial Analysis to Personalise an Agent’s Dynamic Belief, Desire, and Intention Profiles. In: Klusch, M., Omicini, A., Ossowski, S., Laamanen, H. (eds.) CIA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2782, pp. 298–315. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Newton-Smith, W.H.: The Structure of Time. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prouskas, K.-V., Pitt, J.V.: A Real-Time Architecture for Time-Aware Agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part B: Cybernetics 34(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Decision procedures for BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 8(3), 293–344 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sánchez, M.A., Augusto, J.C.: Testing an Implementation of a Temporal Language. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Towards a Logic of Rational Agency. Logic Journal of the IGPL 11(2), 133–157 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning About Rational Agents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jarvis, B., Corbett, D., Jain, L.C. (2005). Reasoning About Time in a BDI Architecture. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11552451_117

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11552451_117

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31986-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics