Skip to main content

Performance Comparison for MLP Networks Using Various Back Propagation Algorithms for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3682))

Abstract

This paper represents the performance comparison of the Multilayered Perceptron (MLP) networks using various back propagation (BP) algorithms for breast cancer diagnosis. The training algorithms used are gradient descent with momentum and adaptive learning, resilient back propagation, Quasi-Newton and Levenberg-Marquardt. The performances of these four algorithms are compared with the standard steepest descent back propagation algorithm. The current study investigates and compares the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, false negative and false positive results of the selected four algorithms to train MLP networks. The Papinicolou image of breast cancer cells were captured via an image analyzer and thirteen morphological features were extracted to numerical scores. The feature scores are used as data sets to train the MLP network. The MLP network using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm displays the best performance for all the five measurement criteria’s (accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, true positive and true negative) at a lower number of hidden nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lim, G.C.C., Yahaya, H., Lim, T.O.: The First Report of the National Cancer Registry: Cancer Incidence in Malaysia 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. MOH (Ministry of Health Malaysia). Malaysia’s Health: Technical report of the directorgeneral of health, Malaysia (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kok, M.R., Schreiner-Kok, P.G., Veen, V.D., Boon, M.E.: Potentially difficult smears of women with squamous cell carcinoma pose fewer problems when PAPNET is used for primary screening. Cytopathology 10(5), 324–334 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitra, P., Mitra, S., Pal, S.K.: Staging of Cervical Cancer with Soft Computing. IEEE Trans. On Biomedical Eng. 47(7), 934–940 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mashor, M.Y., Mat Isa, N.A., Othman, N.H.: Classification of Pap Smear Tests Using Neural Networks. In: IFMBE Proceedings: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 21–24 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yao, X., Liu, Y.: Neural Networks for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. IEEE Trans., 1760–1767 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kates, R., Harbeck, N., Schmitt, M.: Prospects for clinical decision support in breast cancer based on neural network analysis of clinical survival data. In: 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Engineering Systems & Allied Technologies, pp. 764–767 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cybenko, G.: Approximations by superposition of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signal and Systems 2, 303–314 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Funahashi, K.: On the approximate realisation of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Networks 2, 183–192 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Plagianakos, V.P., Sotiropoulos, D.G., Vrahatis, M.N.: An Improved Backpropagation Method with Adaptive Learnaing Rate., Technical Report: Dept. of Mathematics, University of Patras, 2, pp.1-8 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boukis, C.G., Papoulis, E.V.: A normalised adaptive amplitude nonlinear gradient descent algorithm for system identification. IEEE Trans. ICECS, 1042–1045 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mastorocostas, P.A.: Resilient back propagation learning algorithm for recurrent fuzzy neural networks. Electronics Letters 40(1), iii–iv (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ouyang, S., Ching, P.C., Lee, T.: Robust adaptive quasi-Newton algorithms for eigensubspace estimation. IEEE Proceedings-Vis. Image Signal Process 150(5), 321–331 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T., Han, D., Au, F.T.K., Tham, L.G.: Accelaration of Levenberg-Marquardt Training of Neural Networks with Variable Decay Rate. IEEE Trans., 1873–1878 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esugasini, S., Mashor, M.Y., Isa, N.A.M., Othman, N.H. (2005). Performance Comparison for MLP Networks Using Various Back Propagation Algorithms for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11552451_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11552451_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31986-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics