Skip to main content

End-To-End Worst-Case Response Time Analysis for Hard Real-Time Distributed Systems

  • Conference paper
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3688))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1309 Accesses

Abstract

The verification of end-to-end response time for distributed hard real-time systems is quite necessary for safety-critical applications. Although current time analysis techniques can precisely analyze the response time, the performance is not quite satisfying, especially for large size distributed systems. This paper presents a novel end-to-end worst-case response time analysis approach for hard real-time distributed systems. This technique is based on the critical instant analysis and the canonical form transformation. It extends the traditional holistic analysis technique by exploiting the precedence relations between tasks on both different processors and the same processor. Simulation results have shown that this algorithm can achieve accurate results and offers good performance for systems with wide range of CPU utilizations and task set size, and therefore is applicable to schedulability analysis of complex distributed systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Liu, C.L., Layland, J.W.: Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard Real-Time Environment. Journal of the ACM 20(1), 46–61 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Sha, L., Rajkumar, R., Sathaye, S.: Priority inheritance protocols: An approach to real-time synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Computers 39, 1175–1185 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Audsley, N.C., Burns, A., Richardson, M.F., Wellings, A.J.: Hard Real-Time Scheduling: The Deadline Monotonic Approach. In: Proceedings 8th IEEE Workshop on Real-Time Operating Systems and Software, pp. 15–17 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audsley, N.C., Burns, A., Tindell, K., Richardson, M., Wellings, A.: Applying New Scheduling Theory To Static Priority Pre-emptive Scheduling. Software Engineering Journal 8(5), 284–292 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehoczky, J.P.: Fixed Priority Scheduling of Periodic Task Sets With Arbitrary Deadlines. In: Proceedings 11th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pp. 201–209 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, M., Ralya, T., Pollack, B., Obenza, R., González Harbour, M.: A Practitioners Handbook for Real-Time Systems Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tindell, K., Clark, J.: Holistic Schedulability Analysis for Distributed Hard Real-Time Systems. Microprocessing & Microprogramming 50(2-3), 117–134 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palencia, J.C., Gonzalez Harbour, M.: Schedulability analysis for tasks with static and dynamic offsets. In: Proc. of IEEE Real-time Systems Symposium, pp. 26–37 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Palencia Gutiérrez, J.C., Gutiérrez García, J.J., González Harbour, M.: Best-Case Analysis for Improving the Worst-Case Schedulability Test for Distributed Hard Real-Time Systems. In: Proceeding of tenth Euromicro Workshop on Real-Time Systems, pp. 35–44 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Palencia, J.C., Gonzalez Harbour, M.: Exploiting precedence relations in the schedulability analysis of distributed real-time systems. In: Proc. of IEEE Real-time Systems Symposium, pp. 328–339 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harbour, M.G., Klein, M.H., Lehoczky, J.P.: Fixed Priority Scheduling of Periodic Tasks with Varying Execution Priority. In: Proc. of Real-Time Systems Symposium, San Antonio, pp. 116–128 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tindell, K., Burns, A., Wellings, A.J.: Analysis of hard real-time communications. Real-Time Systems 9, 147–171 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henderson, W., Kendall, D., Robson, A.: Improving the Accuracy of Scheduling Analysis Applied to Distributed Systems. Journal of Real-Time Systems 20(1), 5–25 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Redell, O., Sanfridson, M.: Exact Best-Case Response Time Analysis of Fixed Priority Scheduled Tasks. In: The 14th Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems, Vienna (Austria), pp. 165–172 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hladik, P.E., Deplanche, A.M.: Best-Case Response Time Analysis for Precedence Relations in Hard Real-Time Systems. In: Real-Time Systems Symposium Work-in-Progress Session (2003), Available, http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~zaher/rtss-wip/22.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, L., Zhao, M., Zheng, Z., Wu, Z. (2005). End-To-End Worst-Case Response Time Analysis for Hard Real-Time Distributed Systems. In: Winther, R., Gran, B.A., Dahll, G. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3688. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11563228_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11563228_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29200-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32000-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics