Abstract
Automated support for the requirements engineering (RE) process is a recognised research area. However, the practice still relies on office tools rather than RE-tools. Reasons include financial causes and difficulty to evaluate the available RE-tools. This work reports on an experiment trying to validate a previously proposed framework for evaluating RE-tools. The experiment participants used several alternative tools for making requirements specifications, and then evaluated the tools by means of the framework. This enables us to look at the participants’ performance with the various tools, evaluation approaches, and their perceptions about the same tools. The findings indicate advantages of using the evaluation framework, and of combining several evaluation techniques. The experiment indicates that RE-tools provide better support than office tools, leading to higher quality specifications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X., Quer, C.: A Quality Model for Requirements Management Tools, Requirements Engineering for Sociotechnical Systems. Idea Group Publishing (2004)
Feblowitz, M.D., Greenspan, S.J.: Scenario-Based Analysis of COTS Acquisition Impacts. Requirements Engineering 3, 182–201 (1998)
Franch, X., Carvallo, I.: A Quality-Model-Based Approach for Describing and Evaluating Software Packages. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2002), Germany, pp. 104–111 (2002)
Goowin, N.C.: Functionality and Usability. Communications of the ACM 30(3), 229–233 (1987)
Haywood, E., Dart, P.: Towards Requirements for Requirements Modelling Tools. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Australian Workshop on Requirements Engineering, Australia, pp. 61–69 (1997)
Hands, K., Peiris, D.R., Gregor, P.: Development of a Computer-Based Interviewing Tool to Enhance the Requirements Gathering Process. Requirements Engineering 9, 204–216 (2004)
Hoffmann, M., Kuhn, N., Weber, M., Bittner, M.: Requirements for Requirements Management Tools. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Joint International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2004), Japan, pp. 301–308 (2004)
Karlsson, L., Berander, P., Regnell, B., Wohlin, C.: Requirements Prioritisation: An Experiment on Exhaustive Pair-Wise Comparison versus Planning Game Partitioning. In: Proceedings of the Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering, Scotland (2004)
Kontio, J.: A Case Study in Applying a Systematic Method for COTS Selection. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 1996 (1996)
Krogstie, J.: A Semiotic Approach to Quality in Requirements Specifications. In: Proceedings IFIP 8.1 Working Conference on Organisational Semiotics (2001)
Kunda, D.: STACE: Social Technical Approach to COTS Software Selection. In: Cechich, A., Piattini, M., Vallecillo, A. (eds.) Component-Based Software Quality - Methods and Techniques. LNCS, pp. 85–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Lang, M., Duggan, J.: A Tool to Support Collaborative Software Requirements Management. Requirement Engineering 6(3), 161–172 (2001)
Maiden, N.A., Ncube, C.: Acquiring COTS Software Selection Requirements. IEEE Software, 46–56 (1998)
Matulevičius, R.: Validating an Evaluation Framework for Requirement Engineering Tools. In: Krogstie, J., Halpin, T., Siau, K. (eds.) Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies (Adv. Topics of Database Research), pp. 148–174. Idea Group Publishing (2005)
Matulevičius, R.: Prototype of the Evaluation Framework for Functional Requirements of RE-tools. Accepted for the Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2005), Paris, France (August-September 2005)
Matulevičius, R., Sindre, G.: Requirements Engineering Tool Evaluation Approach. Accepted for the Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2005), Karlstad, Sweden (August 2005)
Ochs, M.A., Pfahl, D., Chrobok-Diening, G., Nothhelfer-Kolb, B.: A COTS Acquisition Process: Definition and Application Experience. In: Proceedings of the 11th ESCOM Conference, pp. 335–343 (2000)
Pohl, K.: The Three Dimensions of Requirements Engineering: a Framework and its Applications. Information Systems 19(3), 243–258 (1994)
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Høst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslen, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Matulevičius, R., Sindre, G. (2005). Tool Support and Specification Quality: Experimental Validation of an RE-Tool Evaluation Framework. In: Akoka, J., et al. Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling. ER 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3770. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11568346_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11568346_46
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29395-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32239-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)