Skip to main content

Retrieval Status Values in Information Retrieval Evaluation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3772))

Abstract

Retrieval systems rank documents according to their retrieval status values (RSV) if these are monotonously increasing with the probability of relevance of documents. In this work, we investigate the links between RSVs and IR system evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kagolovsk, Y., Moehr, J.: Current status of the evaluation in information retrieval. Journal of medical systems 27, 409–424 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. JASIS 26, 321–343 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mizzaro, S.: How many relevances in information retrieval? Interacting with Computers 10, 303–320 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zobel, J.: How reliable are the results of large scale information retrieval experiments. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 1998, pp. 307–314 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Korfhage, R.: Information storage and retrieval. Wiley Computer publising, Chichester (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nottelman, H., Fuhr, N.: From retrieval status value to probabilities of relevance for advanced ir applications. Information retrieval 6, 363–388 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, J.H.: Combining multiple evidence from different properties of weighting schemes. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1995, pp. 180–188 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kamps, J., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., Sigurbjörnsson, B.: The importance of morphological normalization for xml retrieval. In: Proceedings of INEX 2003, pp. 41–48 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jijkoun, V., Mishne, G., Monz, C., de Rijke, M., Schlobach, S., Tsur, O.: The university of amsterdam at the trec 2003 question answering track (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Imafouo, A., Tannier, X. (2005). Retrieval Status Values in Information Retrieval Evaluation. In: Consens, M., Navarro, G. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29740-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32241-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics