Skip to main content

Comparison of Representations of Multiple Evidence Using a Functional Framework for IR

  • Conference paper
  • 1503 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3772))

Abstract

The combination of sources of evidence is an important subject of research in information retrieval and can be a good strategy for improving the quality of rankings. Another active research topic is modeling and is one of the central tasks in the development of information retrieval systems. In this paper, we analyze the combination of multiple evidence using a functional framework, presenting two case studies of the use of the framework to combine multiple evidence in contexts bayesian belief networks and in the vector space model. This framework is a meta-theory that represents IR models in a unique common language, allowing the representation, formulation and comparison of these models without the need to carry out experiments. We show that the combination of multiple evidence in the bayesian belief network can be carried at in of several ways, being that each form corresponds to a similarity function in the vector model. The analysis of this correspondence is made through the functional framework. We show that the framework allows us to design new models and helps designers to modify these models to extend them with new evidence sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crestani, F., Lalmas, M.: Logic and uncertainty in information retrieval. In: Agosti, M., Crestani, F., Pasi, G. (eds.) ESSIR 2000. LNCS, vol. 1980, pp. 179–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinheiro de Cristo, M.A., Calado, P., Silveira, M., Silva, I., Muntz, R.R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.A.: Bayesian belief networks for ir. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 34(2-3), 163–179 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dominich, S.: A unified mathematical definition of classical information retrieval. Jornal of the American Society for Information Science 51(7), 614–624 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dominich, S.: On applying formal grammar and languages, and deduction to information retrieval modelling. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR MF/IR, pp. 37–41 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abinader Júnior, E.M.: Combinação e avaliação de múltiplas fontes de evidências para recuperação de documento na web. Master’s thesis, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Instituto de Ciências Exatas, Amazonas,Manaus (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lalmas, M., Bruza, P.D.: The use of logic in information retrieval modeling. Knowledge Engineering Review 13(3), 263–295 (1998) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ráez, A.M.: Formal models for ir: a review and a proposal for keyword assignment. In: Workshop on Mathematical/Formal Methods in Information Retrieval, ACM-SIGIR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ribeiro(Ribeiro-Neto), B., Muntz, R.: A belief network model for ir. In: Proc. of the 19th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 253–260 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Silva, I., Ribeiro-Neto, B., Calado, P., Moura, E., Ziviani, N.: Link-based and content-based evidential information in a belief network model. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Athens, Greece, July 2000, pp. 96–103 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silva, I., Souza, J., Moura, R., Ribeiro-Neto: Informação de Links no Modelo Vetorial Usando uma Estrutura Funcional. In: Anais do 18th Simpósio Brasileiro de Banco de Dados, Manaus, AM, Brasil, pp. 170–184 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Song, D.W., Wong, K.F., Bruza, P.D., Cheng, C.H.: Towards a commonsense aboutness theory for information retrieval modeling. In: Proceedings of the FourthWorld Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2000), Orlando, Florida (USA), July 2000, pp. 23–26 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Westerveld, T., Kraaij, W., Hiemstra, D.: Retrieving Web pages using content, links, URLs and anchors. In: The Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-2001), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, November 2001, pp. 663–672 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wong, K.F., Song, D., Bruza, P., Cheng, C.H.: Application of aboutness to functional benchmarking in information retrieval. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 337–370 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva, I.R., Souza, J.N., Oliveira, L.C. (2005). Comparison of Representations of Multiple Evidence Using a Functional Framework for IR. In: Consens, M., Navarro, G. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3772. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575832_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29740-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32241-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics