Abstract
Too many improvement and innovation projects fail. We have studied characteristics of successful and failed projects. From this study we derived 19 parameters that influence success and failure. We used the parameters to build an Ability Improvement Model (AIM), which is a model that can be used to measure an organizations or a projects ability to succeed with improvement. After having build AIM we tested it in real life in a large organization, learned from the experience and improved the model. Then we tested it again in two organizations with promising results. In the paper we report on the considerations and research behind AIM. Finally we describe the method, and how the model can be used in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Goldenson, D.R., Hersleb, J.D.: After the Appraisal: A systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (1995)
El-Emam, K., et al.: Modelling the Likelihood of Software Process Improvement: An Exploratory Study. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 207–229. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2001)
Blanco, M., et al.: SPI Patterns: Learning from Experience. IEEE Software, 28–35 (May/June 2001)
Rainer, A., Hall, T.: Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software 62, 71–84 (2002)
Robert, G.: Successful Software process improvement. Pentice Hall PTR (1997) ISBN: 0-13-626623-1
Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement – Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998) ISBN 0-201-17782-X
Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice 4(4) (1999)
Dybå, T.: An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 357–390. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (2000)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1990)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1998)
Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)
Kuvaja, P., Similä, J., Krzanik, L., Bicego, A., Saukkonen, S., Koch, G.: Software Process Assessment & Improvement. The BOOTSTRAP Approach. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1994)
Galliers, R.: Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches. In: Galliers, R. (ed.) Information Systems research. Blackwell scientific Publications, Oxford (1992)
Susman, G., Evered, R.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23(4), 582–603 (1978)
Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI – Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (2005). AIM – Ability Improvement Model. In: Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3792. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11586012_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30286-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32271-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)