Skip to main content

Universally Composable Oblivious Transfer in the Multi-party Setting

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3860))

Abstract

We construct efficient universally composable oblivious transfer protocols in the multi-party setting for honest majorities. Unlike previous proposals our protocols are designed in the plain model (i.e., without a common reference string), are secure against malicious adversaries from scratch (i.e., without requiring an expensive compiler), and are based on weaker cryptographic assumptions than comparable two-party protocols. Hence, the active participation of auxiliary parties pays off in terms of complexity. This is particularly true for the construction of one of our building blocks, an efficient universally composable homomorphic commitment scheme. Efficient solutions for this problem in the two-party setting are not known, not even in the common reference string model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello, W., Ishai, Y., Reingold, O.: Priced Oblivious Transfer: How to Sell Digital Goods. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 119–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brassard, G., Crpeau, C., Robert, J.-M.: All-or-Nothing Disclosure of Secrets. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (ed.) CRYPTO 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 234–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Or, M., Goldwasser, S., Wigderson, A.: Completeness Theorems for Non-Cryptographic Fault-Tolerant Distributed Computation. In: STOC 1988, pp. 1–10. ACM Press, New York (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellare, M., Micali, S.: Non-Interactive Oblivious Transfer and Applications. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 547–557. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canetti, R.: Universally Composable Security: A new Paradigm for Cryptographic Protocols. In: FOCS 2001. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canetti, R.: On Universally Composable Notions of Security for Signature, Certification and Authentication. In: CSFW 2004. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cramer, R., Damgård, I., Schoenmakers, B.: Proofs of Partial Knowledge and Simplified Desing of Witness Hiding Protocols. In: Desmedt, Y.G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1994. LNCS, vol. 839, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Canetti, R., Fischlin, M.: Universally Composable Commitments. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 19–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Canetti, R., Feige, U., Goldreich, O., Naor, M.: Adaptively Secure Multi- Party Computation. In: STOC 1996, pp. 639–648. ACM Press, New York (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Canetti, R., Lindell, Y., Ostrovsky, R., Sahai, A.: Universally Composable Two-Party and Multi-Party Secure Computation. In: STOC 2002, pp. 494–503. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Crépeau, C.: Equivalence Between Two Flavors of Oblivious Transfer. In: Pomerance, C. (ed.) CRYPTO 1987. LNCS, vol. 293, pp. 350–354. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Damgård, I., Nielsen, J.: Improved Non-Committing Encryption Schemes Based on a General Complexity Assumption. In: Bellare, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2000. LNCS, vol. 1880, pp. 432–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Even, S., Goldreich, O., Lempel, A.: A Randomized Protocol for Signing Contracts. Comm. ACM 28(6), 637–647 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gertner, Y., Kannan, S., Malkin, T., Reingold, O., Viswanathan, M.: The Relationship between Public Key Encryption and Oblivious Transfer. In: FOCS 2000. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garay, J., MacKenzie, P.: Concurrent Oblivious Transfer. In: FOCS 2000, pp. 314–324. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goldreich, O., Micali, S., Wigderson, A.: How to Play any Mental Game. In: STOC 1987, pp. 218–229. ACM Press, New York (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Garay, J., MacKenzie, P., Yang, K.: Efficient and Universally Composable Committed Oblivious Transfer and Applications. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 297–316. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilian, J.: Founding Crytpography on Oblivious Transfer. In: STOC 1988, pp. 20–31. ACM Press, New York (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindell, Y.: Lower Bounds for Concurrent Self Composition. In: Naor, M. (ed.) TCC 2004. LNCS, vol. 2951, pp. 203–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Naor, M., Pinkas, B.: Efficient Oblivious Transfer Protocols. In: SODA 2001, pp. 448–457. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Naor, M., Pinkas, B., Sumner, R.: Privacy Preserving Auctions and Mechanism Design. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 129–139. ACM Press, New York (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Prabhakaran, M., Sahai, A.: New Notions of Security: Achieving Universal Composability without Trusted Setup. In: STOC 2004, pp. 242–251. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Rabin, M.: How to Exchange Secrets by Oblivious Transfer. Technical Report TR 1981, Aiken Computation Laboratory (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schnorr, C.P.: Efficient Signature Generation by Smart Cards. Journal of Cryptology 4, 161–174 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Shamir, A.: How to Share a Secret. Comm. ACM 22, 612–613 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fischlin, M. (2006). Universally Composable Oblivious Transfer in the Multi-party Setting. In: Pointcheval, D. (eds) Topics in Cryptology – CT-RSA 2006. CT-RSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3860. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11605805_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31033-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32648-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics