Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complexity Results on Branching-Time Pushdown Model Checking

  • Conference paper
Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (VMCAI 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3855))

Abstract

The model checking problem of pushdown systems (PMC problem, for short) against standard branching temporal logics has been intensively studied in the literature. In particular, for the modal μ-calculus, the most powerful branching temporal logic used for verification, the problem is known to be Exptime-complete (even for a fixed formula). The problem remains Exptime-complete also for the logic CTL, which corresponds to a fragment of the alternation-free modal μ-calculus. However, the exact complexity in the size of the pushdown system (for a fixed CTL formula) is an open question: it lies somewhere between Pspace and Exptime. To the best of our knowledge, the PMC problem for CTL * has not been investigated so far. In this paper, we show that this problem is 2Expspace-complete. Moreover, we prove that the program complexity of the PMC problem against CTL (i.e., the complexity of the problem in terms of the size of the system) is Exptime-complete.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alur, R., Etessami, K., Madhusudan, P.: A temporal Logic of Nested Calls and Returns. In: Jensen, K., Podelski, A. (eds.) TACAS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2988, pp. 467–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouajjani, A., Esparza, J., Maler, O.: Reachability Analysis of Pushdown Automata: Application to Model-Checking. In: Mazurkiewicz, A., Winkowski, J. (eds.) CONCUR 1997. LNCS, vol. 1243, pp. 135–150. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caucal, D.: On infinite transition graphs having a decidable monadic theory. In: Meyer auf der Heide, F., Monien, B. (eds.) ICALP 1996. LNCS, vol. 1099, pp. 194–205. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke, E.M., Emerson, E.A.: Design and verification of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. In: Kozen, D. (ed.) Logic of Programs 1981. LNCS, vol. 131, pp. 52–71. Springer, Heidelberg (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra, A.K., Kozen, D.C., Stockmeyer, L.J.: Alternation. Journal of the ACM 28(1), 114–133 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, E.A., Halpern, J.Y.: Sometimes and not never revisited: On branching versus linear time. Journal of the ACM 33(1), 151–178 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Esparza, J., Hansel, D., Rossmanith, P., Schwoon, S.: Efficient algorithms for model checking pushdown systems. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 232–247. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Emerson, E.A., Jutla, C.S.: Tree automata, μ-calculus and determinacy. In: FOCS 1991, pp. 368–377 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Esparza, J., Kucera, A., Schwoon, S.: Model checking LTL with regular valuations for pushdown systems. Inf. Comput. 186(2), 355–376 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kupferman, O., Piterman, N., Vardi, M.Y.: Pushdown specifications. In: Baaz, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2514, pp. 262–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kupferman, O., Thiagarajan, P.S., Madhusudan, P., Vardi, M.Y.: Open systems in reactive environments: Control and Synthesis. In: Palamidessi, C. (ed.) CONCUR 2000. LNCS, vol. 1877, pp. 92–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.Y., Wolper, P.: An Automata-Theoretic Approach to Branching-Time Model Checking. Journal of the ACM 47(2), 312–360 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, D.E., Shupp, P.E.: The theory of ends, pushdown automata, and second-order logic. Theoretical Computer Science 37, 51–75 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Muller, D.E., Shupp, P.E.: Alternating automata on infinite trees. Theoretical Computer Science 54, 267–276 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Piterman, N., Vardi, M.Y.: Global model-checking of infinite-state systems. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 387–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sistla, A.P., Clarke, E.M.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logics. Journal of the ACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Vardi, M.Y.: A temporal fixpoint calculus. In: POPL 1988, pp. 250–259. ACM Press, New York (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about the past with two-way automata. In: Larsen, K.G., Skyum, S., Winskel, G. (eds.) ICALP 1998. LNCS, vol. 1443, pp. 628–641. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Walukiewicz, I.: Pushdown processes: Games and Model Checking. In: Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) CAV 1996. LNCS, vol. 1102, pp. 62–74. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Walukiewicz, I.: Model checking CTL properties of pushdown systems. In: Kapoor, S., Prasad, S. (eds.) FST TCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1974, pp. 127–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Cintia, 80126, Napoli, Italy

    Laura Bozzelli

Authors
  1. Laura Bozzelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harvard University,, 02138, Cambridge, Mass, USA

    E. Allen Emerson

  2. Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent,  

    Kedar S. Namjoshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bozzelli, L. (2005). Complexity Results on Branching-Time Pushdown Model Checking. In: Emerson, E.A., Namjoshi, K.S. (eds) Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation. VMCAI 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3855. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11609773_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11609773_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31139-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31622-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation