Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Learning Models for Collaborative e-Learning

  • Conference paper
Book cover Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment (Edutainment 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3942))

Abstract

Due to the advance of e-community, collaborative learning becomes popular on the Web. Among the learning models for collaborative learning on the Web, there are seminar-based model and project-based model. The objective of this paper is to compare the two learning models by analyzing learners’ activities. Among learners’ activities, we focus on learners’ interaction level, their collaborability, and their accountability. Also, we propose new assessment items for evaluating learners fairly. In this paper, the existing evaluation items in traditional classroom-based collaborative learning are firstly analyzed in order to develop new evaluation criteria for the Web. Based on these analyzed items, we propose new items for assessing learners’ activities in Web-based collaborative learning. After two Web-based classes, each of which has a different learning model, are performed, the proposed items are applied to compare the two learning models in terms of learners’ interaction level, collaborability, and accountability. By performing this research, we can understand learners’ activities clearer and can develop a better instructional technique to make improved academic achievement, improved attendance, and increased self-confidence in collaborative e-learning.

This work was supported by Korea Research Foundation (KRF-2003-003-B00290).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baek, Y.K.: Design of Web-based Learning. Yangseowon Publishing Co. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonk, C.J.: Collaborative Tool for e-Learning (2002), http://www.clomagazine.com

  3. Boo, S.M., Park, C.J.: Development of Self/Peer Assessment Items for Cooperative Learning. Korean Domestic Journal of Computer Education 6(1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, E., Park, C., Rim, H.: Evaluating the Web-based Instruction by Item Analysis. In: Kumar, V., Gavrilova, M.L., Tan, C.J.K., L’Ecuyer, P. (eds.) ICCSA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2668. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, E.G.: Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups. Review of Educational Research 64(1) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornell University, Likert Scaling (2002), http://trochim.human.cornel.edu/kb/scallik.htm

  7. Johnson, D., Johnson, R.: Cooperative Learning (2001), http://www.clcrc.com/pages/cl.html

  8. Disney Learning Partnership. Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: Explanation, http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/month4/index.html

  9. Harasim, L., Calivert, T., Groeneboer, C.: Virtual-U: A Web-based System to Support Collaborative Learning (1995), http://kmh.ync.ac.kr/html/whtml/wbi/ch18.html

  10. Kang, M.O.: Collaborative Learning Strategy for Web-based Linguistics Lectures. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Korean Domestic Conference on Korean Linguistics (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kang, I.A., Lee, M.S., Kim, J.H., Lee, I.S.: Case Study on Web-based Problem-solving Learning Model. Korean Domestic Journal of Education Engineering 15(1) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaufman, D.B., Felder, R.M.: Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperative Learning Teams. Journal of Engineering Education 89(2) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lamb, A.: Project, Problem, and Inquiry-Based Learning (2004), http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic43.htm

  14. Park, D.S.: Methodology for Constructing Items. Education & Science Publishing Co. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roh, H.J.: Investigation Method and Statistical Analysis using Korean SPSS 10.0. Hyungseol Publishing Co. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative Learning: where behavioral and humanistic approaches to classroom motivation meet. Elementary School Journal 88 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valiathan, P.: Blended Learning Models (2002), http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/aug2002/valiathan.html

  18. Willkins, D.E., Lawhead, P.B.: Evaluating Individuals in Team Projects. In: Proceedings of SIGCSE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Park, C.J., Hyun, J.S. (2006). Comparison of Two Learning Models for Collaborative e-Learning. In: Pan, Z., Aylett, R., Diener, H., Jin, X., Göbel, S., Li, L. (eds) Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment. Edutainment 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3942. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11736639_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33423-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33424-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics