Skip to main content

A Generalized Fuzzy Optimization Framework for R&D Project Selection Using Real Options Valuation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3982))

Abstract

Global marketplace and intense competition in the business environment lead organizations to focus on selecting the best R&D project portfolio among available projects using their scarce resources in the most effective manner. This happens to be a sine qua non for high technology firms to sharpen their competitive advantage and realize long-term survival with sustainable growth. To accomplish that, firms should take into account both the uncertainty inherent in R&D using appropriate valuation techniques accounting for flexibility in making investment decisions and all possible interactions between the candidate projects within an optimization framework. This paper provides a fuzzy optimization model for dealing with the complexities and uncertainties regarding the construction of an R&D project portfolio. Real options analysis, which accounts for managerial flexibility, is employed to correct the deficiency of traditional discounted cash flow valuation that excludes any form of flexibility. An example is provided to illustrate the proposed decision approach.

This research has been financially supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carlsson, C., Fullér, R.: A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139, 297–312 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Carr, P.: The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities. The Journal of Finance 43, 1235–1256 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixit, A.K., Pindyck, R.S.: The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 105–115 (May-June 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geske, R., Johnson, H.E.: The American put option valued analytically. The Journal of Finance 39, 1511–1524 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inuiguchi, M., Ramik, J.: Possibilistic linear programming: a brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 111, 3–28 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Karsak, E.E., Özogul, C.O.: An options approach to valuing expansion flexibility in flexible manufacturing system investments. The Engineering Economist 47, 169–193 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuchta, D.: A fuzzy model for R&D project selection with benefit, outcome and resource interactions. The Engineering Economist 46, 164–180 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J.W., Kim, S.H.: Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research 27, 367–382 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, J., Paxson, D.A.: Valuation of R&D real American sequential exchange options. R&D Management 31, 191–201 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liberatore, M.: An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 34, 12–18 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Margrabe, W.: The value of an option to exchange one asset for another. The Journal of Finance 33, 177–186 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meade, L.M., Presley, A.: R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 49, 59–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt, R.L.: A model for R&D project selection with combined benefit, outcome and resource interactions. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 40, 403–410 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J., Hwang, W.-L.: A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. To appear in Omega (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watters, L.J.: Reduction of integer polynomial programming problems to zero-one linear programming problems. Operations Research 15, 1171–1174 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weingartner, H.M.: Capital budgeting of interrelated projects: survey and synthesis. Management Science 12, 485–516 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karsak, E.E. (2006). A Generalized Fuzzy Optimization Framework for R&D Project Selection Using Real Options Valuation. In: Gavrilova, M., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2006. ICCSA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3982. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_96

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11751595_96

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34075-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34076-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics