Skip to main content

A Case Study on the Success of Introducing General Non-construction Activities for Project Management and Planning Improvement

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4034))

Abstract

The creation of a proper work breakdown structure (WBS) is essential in performing successful project effort estimation and project management. The use of WBS is required on the level 1 of CMMI. There is, however, no standard WBS available. In this paper, the results of a pilot project in which new activities were introduced into the TietoEnator’s WBS are reported. The activities were non-construction activities which are necessary but not directly related to the actual software construction. The study shows that the success of the introduction of such activities very much depends on the naming of the activities and how they are introduced to the employees. Additionally, it turned out that the pre-thought set of non-construction activities included activities that should not have been in the set at all as individual activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wilson, D.N., Sifer, M.J.: Structured planning—project views. Software Engineering Journal 3, 134–140 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolverton, R.W.: The cost of developing large-scale software. IEEE Transactions on Computers 23, 615–636 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boehm, B.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. SEI: Capability maturity model integration (CMMI), version 1.1, staged representation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TE-029, ESC-TR-2002-029, CMU/SEI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haapio, T.: The effects of non-construction activities on effort estimation. In: Proceedings of the 27th Information Systems Research in Scandinavia (IRIS’27) (2004), Available at: http://w3.msi.vxu.se/users/per/IRIS27/iris27-1021.pdf

  6. MacDonell, S.G., Shepperd, M.J.: Using Prior-Phase Effort Records for Re-estimation During Software Projects. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2003), pp. 1–13. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, B., Horowitz, E., Madachy, R., Reifer, D., Clark, B., Steece, B., Brown, A., Chulani, S., Abts, C.: Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hale, J., Parrish, A., Dixon, B., Smith, R.K.: Enhancing the cocomo estimation models. IEEE Software 17, 45–49 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn, J.D., Scudder, G.D., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: Improving speed and productivity of software development: A global survey of software developers. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22, 875–885 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collier, B., DeMarco, T., Fearey, P.A.: Defined process for project post-mortem review. IEEE Software 13, 65–72 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brady, S., DeMarco, T.: Management-aided software engineering. IEEE Software 11, 25–32 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jalote, P.: CMM In Practice: Processes for Executing Software Projects at Infosys. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Harlow (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zahran, S.: Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, H.Y., Jung, H.W., Chung, C.S., Lee, J., Lee, K., Jeong, H.: Analysis of interrater agreement in iso/iec 15504-based software process assessment. In: APAQS 2001: Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software, p. 341. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Damian, D., Zowghi, D., Vaidyanathasamy, L., Pal, Y.: An industrial experience in process improvement: An early assessment at the australian center for unisys software. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESE 2002, pp. 111–126. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rautianen, K., Lassenius, C., Vähäniitty, J., Pyhäjärvi, M., Vanhanen, J.: A tentative framework for managing software product development in small companies. In: HICSS 2002: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002), vol. 8, p. 251. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McBride, T., Henderson-Sellers, B., Zowghi, D.: Project management capability levels: An empirical study. In: APSEC 2004: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2004), pp. 56–63. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo, C., Yoon, J., Lee, B., Lee, C., Lee, J., Hyun, S., Wu, C.: An integrated model of ISO 9001: 2000 and CMMI for ISO registered organizations. In: APSEC 2004: Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2004), pp. 150–157. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. SEI: Capability maturity model integration (CMMI), version 1.1, continuous representation. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-028, ESC-TR-2002-028, CMU/SEI (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Järvinen, P.: On Research Methods. Opinpajan Kirja, Tampere, Finland (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iivari, J.: A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of is development. European Journal of Information Systems 1, 249–272 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L., Pfleeger, S.L.: Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software 12, 52–62 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn. PWS Publishing Company, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haapio, T., Ahonen, J.J. (2006). A Case Study on the Success of Introducing General Non-construction Activities for Project Management and Planning Improvement. In: Münch, J., Vierimaa, M. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4034. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767718_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11767718_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34682-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34683-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics