Skip to main content

Institutional 2-cells and Grothendieck Institutions

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4060))

Abstract

We propose to use Grothendieck institutions based on 2-categorical diagrams as a basis for heterogeneous specification. We prove a number of results about colimits and (some weak variants of) exactness. This framework can also be used for obtaining proof systems for heterogeneous theories involving institution semi-morphisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergstra, J., Heering, J., Klint, P.: Module Algebra. J. ACM 37(2), 335–372 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Borzyszkowski, T.: Generalized interpolation in CASL. Information Processing Letters 76(1-2), 19–24 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. CoFI (The Common Framework Initiative). In: Mosses, P.D. (ed.) CASL Reference Manual. LNCS, vol. 2960, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diaconescu, R.: Institution-independent Model Theory. Book draft (Ask author for a current draft) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diaconescu, R.: Grothendieck institutions. Applied categorical structures 10, 383–402 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Diaconescu, R., Goguen, J., Stefaneas, P.: Logical support for modularisation. In: Huet, G., Plotkin, G. (eds.) Proceedings of a Workshop on Logical Frameworks (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goguen, J., Roşu, G.: Institution morphisms. Formal aspects of computing 13, 274–307 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Introducing institutions. In: Clarke, E., Kozen, D. (eds.) Logic of Programs 1983. LNCS, vol. 164, pp. 221–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: A study in the foundations of programming methodology: Specifications, institutions, charters and parchments. In: Poigné, A., Pitt, D.H., Rydeheard, D.E., Abramsky, S. (eds.) Category Theory and Computer Programming. LNCS, vol. 240, pp. 313–333. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goguen, J.A., Burstall, R.M.: Abstract model theory for specification and programming. In: Clarke, E., Kozen, D. (eds.) Logic of Programs 1983. LNCS, vol. 164, pp. 221–256. Springer, Heidelberg (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrlich, H., Strecker, G.: Category Theory. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mossakowski, T.: Comorphism-based Grothendieck logics. In: Diks, K., Rytter, W. (eds.) MFCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2420, pp. 593–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mossakowski, T.: Relating Casl with other specification languages: the institution level. Theoretical Computer Science 286, 367–475 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mossakowski, T.: Heterogeneous specification and the heterogeneous tool set. Habilitation thesis, University of Bremen (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mossakowski, T., Autexier, S., Hutter, D.: Development graphs – proof management for structured specifications. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 67(1-2), 114–145 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mossakowski, T., Maeder, C., Lüttich, K., Wölfl, S.: The heterogeneous tool set (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mossakowski, T., Schröder, L., Roggenbach, M., Reichel, H.: Algebraic-coalgebraic specification in CoCASL. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 67(1-2), 146–197 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Roşu, G., Goguen, J.: Composing hidden information modules over inclusive institutions (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sannella, D., Tarlecki, A.: Specifications in an arbitrary institution. Information and Computation 76, 165–210 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarlecki, A.: Moving between logical systems. In: Haveraaen, M., Dahl, O.-J., Owe, O. (eds.) Abstract Data Types 1995 and COMPASS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1130, pp. 478–502. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tarlecki, A., Burstall, R.M., Goguen, J.A.: Some fundamentals algebraic tools for the semantics of computation. Part 3: Indexed categories. Theoretical Computer Science 91, 239–264 (1991)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mossakowski, T. (2006). Institutional 2-cells and Grothendieck Institutions. In: Futatsugi, K., Jouannaud, JP., Meseguer, J. (eds) Algebra, Meaning, and Computation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4060. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11780274_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11780274_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35462-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35464-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics