Abstract
Illustrating a dynamic process with an arrow-containing diagram is a widespread convention in people’s daily communications. In order to build a basis for capturing the structure and semantics of such diagrams, this paper formalizes the topological relations between two arrow symbols and discusses the influence of these topological relations on the diagram’s semantics. Topological relations of arrow symbols are established by two types of links, intersections and common references, which are further categorized into nine types based on the combination of the linked parts. The topological relations are captured by the existence/non-existence of these nine types of intersections and common references. Then, this paper demonstrates that arrow symbols with different types of intersections typically illustrate two actions with different interrelations, whereas the arrow symbols with common references illustrate a pair of semantics that may be mutually exclusive or synchronized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J.: Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)
Barraclough, G. (ed.): Collins Atlas of World History, 2nd revised edn. Borders Press, Ann Arbor (2003)
Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: Topological Invariants for Lines. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1), 38–54 (1998)
Egenhofer, M.: Definitions of Line-Line Relations for Geographic Databases. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 16(3), 40–45 (1994a)
Egenhofer, M.: Deriving the Composition of Binary Topological Relations. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 5(2), 133–149 (1994b)
Egenhofer, M.: Spherical Topological Relations. Journal on Data Semantics III, 25–49 (2005)
Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)
Egenhofer, M., Herring, J.: Categorizing Binary Topological Relationships between Regions, Lines and Points in Geographic Databases. In: Egenhofer, M., Herring, J., Smith, T., Park, K. (eds.) A Framework for the Definitions of Topological Relationships and an Algebraic Approach to Spatial Reasoning within This Framework, NCGIA Technical Reports 91-7, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA (1991)
Egenhofer, M., Mark, D.: Naive Geography. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Horn, R.: Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century. MacroVu, Inc., Bainbridge Island (1998)
Hornsby, K., Egenhofer, M., Hayes, P.: Modeling Cyclic Change. In: Chen, P., Embley, D., Kouloumdjian, J., Liddle, S., Roddick, J. (eds.) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. LNCS, vol. 1227, pp. 98–109. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.: Semantics of Simple Arrow Diagrams. In: Barkowsky, T., Freksa, C., Hegarty, M., Lowe, R. (eds.) AAAI Spring Symposium on Reasoning with Mental and External Diagram: Computational Modeling and Spatial Assistance, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 101–104 (2005a)
Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.: Structure and Semantics of Arrow Diagrams. In: Cohn, A.G., Mark, D.M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 232–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2005b)
Moratz, R., Renz, J., Wolter, D.: Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Line Segments. In: Horn, W. (ed.) 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Berlin, pp. 234–238 (2000)
Nedas, K., Egenhofer, M., Wilmsen, D.: Metric Details of Topological Line-Line Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science (in press), http://www.spatial.maine.edu/~max/RJ53.html
Renz, J.: A Spatial Odyssey of the Interval Algebra: 1. Directed Intervals. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2001, Seattle, WA, pp. 51–56 (2001)
Schlieder, C.: Reasoning about Ordering. In: Kuhn, W., Frank, A.U. (eds.) COSIT 1995. LNCS, vol. 988, pp. 341–349. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., Morrison, J.: Enriching Animations. In: Lowe, R., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with animation: Research and application. Cambridge University Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kurata, Y., Egenhofer, M.J. (2006). Topological Relations of Arrow Symbols in Complex Diagrams. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4045. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35623-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35624-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)