Skip to main content

Evaluation of ERST – An External Representation Selection Tutor

  • Conference paper
Book cover Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4045))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes the evaluation of ERST, an adaptive system which is designed to improve its users’ external representation (ER) selection accuracy on a range of database query tasks. The design of the system was informed by the results of experimental studies. Those studies examined the interactions between the participants’ background knowledge-of-external representations, their preferences for selecting particular information display forms, and their performance across a range of tasks involving database queries. The paper describes how ERST’s adaptation is based on predicting users’ ER-to-task matching skills and performance at reasoning with ERs, via a Bayesian user model. The model drives ERST’s adaptive interventions in two ways – by 1. hinting to the user that particular representations be used, and/or 2. by removing from the user the opportunity to select display forms which have been associated with prior poor performance for that user. The results show that ERST does improve an individual’s ER reasoning performance. The system is able to successfully predict users’ ER-to-task matching skills and their ER reasoning performance via its Bayesian user model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J.: A study of user model based link annotation in educational hypermedia. Journal of Universal Computer Science, special issue on assessment issues for educational software 4, 429–448 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, P.C.-H.: Functional roles for the cognitive analysis of diagrams in problem solving. In: Cottrell, G.W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 207–212. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainly in student modeling. User Modeling & User-Adapted Interaction 12, 371–417 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox, R., Brna, P.: Supporting the use of external representations in problem solving: The need for flexible learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 6, 239–302 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, R., Stenning, K., Oberlander, J.: The effect of graphical and sentential logic teaching on spontaneous external representation. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society 2, 5–75 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cox, R.: Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction 9, 343–363 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox, R., Grawemeyer, B.: The mental organisation of external representations. In: European Cognitive Science Conference (EuroCogSci). Osnabrück (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cox, R., Romero, P., du Boulay, B., Lutz, R.: A cognitive processing perspective on student programmers’ ‘graphicacy’. In: Blackwell, A.F., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2980, pp. 344–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Day, R.: Alternative representations. In: Bower, G. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 22, pp. 261–305 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R.: The effects of knowledge of external representations and display selection upon database query performance. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Interactive Graphical Communication (IGC 2003), University of London, Queen Mary (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R.: A Bayesian approach to modelling user’s information display preferences. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 233–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R.: Graphical data displays and database queries: Helping users select the right display for the task. In: Butz, A., Fisher, B., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds.) SG 2005. LNCS, vol. 3638, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Humphreys, G.W., Riddoch, M.J.: Visual object processing: A cognitive neuropsychological approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jameson, A., Gromann-Hutter, B., March, L., Rummer, R.: Creating an empirical basis for adaptation decisions. In: Lieberman, H. (ed.) IUI 2000: International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirby, J.R., Moore, P.J., Schofield, N.J.: Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary educational psychology 13, 169–184 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E.: Visual/spatial abilities in problem solving in physics. In: Anderson, M., Mayer, B., Olivier, P. (eds.) Diagrammatic representation and reasoning, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Norman, D.A.: Things that make us smart. Addison-Wesley, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Novick, L.R., Hurley, S.M., Francis, M.: Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations. Memory & Cognition 27, 288–308 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Novick, L.R., Hurley, S.M.: To Matrix, Network, or Hierarchy: That Is the Question. Cognitive Psychology 42, 158–216 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shute, V.J., Gawlick-Grendell, L.A., Young, R.K., Burnham, C.A.: An experimental system for learning probability: Stat Lady description and evaluation. Instructional Science 24, 25–46 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stenning, K., Cox, R., Oberlander, J.: Contrasting the cognitive effects of graphical and sentential logic teaching: Reasoning, representation and individual differences. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 333–354 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vessey, I.: Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sciences 22, 219–241 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weibelzahl, S.: Problems and Pitfalls in Evaluating Adaptive Systems. In: Chen, S., Magoulas, G. (eds.) Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems, pp. 285–299. IRM Press, Heshey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grawemeyer, B. (2006). Evaluation of ERST – An External Representation Selection Tutor. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4045. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11783183_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35623-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35624-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics