Abstract
General-purpose modeling languages are inadequate to model and visualize business processes precisely. An enterprise has its own vocabulary for modeling processes and its specific tasks may have attached data that define the tasks precisely. We propose using Domain Specific Modeling (DSM) languages to model business processes, such that an enterprise can define its own DSM language(s) capturing its vocabulary and data requirement. We suggest using UML profiles and UML activity diagrams as the semantic base for these DSM languages and present tools that are able to create a DSM language and tool support for a given domain. One tool, called ADSpecializer, can generate a UML profile and its tool support of a given application domain. The other tool, ADModeler, is used to create UML activity diagrams within such a domain-specific UML profile. The two tools enable an enterprise to efficiently define and utilize their own DSM language.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bézivin, J., Heckel, R.: Language Engineering for Model-driven Software Development. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 04101, 1–8 (2005)
Havey, M.: Essential Business Process Modeling. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2005)
OMG: Meta Object Facility 2.0 Specification. Document id: ptc/04-10-15 (2003)
OMG: UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. Document id: formal/05-07-04 (2005)
Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture- Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)
BPEL: BEA, Microsoft, IBM, SAP, Siebel, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.1 (2003)
GME, Generic Modeling Environment (last accessed, January 29, 2006), http://www.isis.vanderbilt.edu/Projects/gme
Heckel, R., Voigt, H.: Model-Based Development of Executable Business Processes for Web Services. In: Desel, J., Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ACPN 2003. LNCS, vol. 3098, pp. 559–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(1), 5–51 (2003)
Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.H.M., Russell, N.: Pattern-based Analysis of UML Activity Diagrams. Technical report #129, Beta Research School, Eindhoven University of Technology (December 2004)
Dumas, M., Hofstede, A.H.M.: UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) UML 2001. LNCS, vol. 2185, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
MetaEdit+, MetaCase modeling tool (last accessed, January 29, 2006), http://www.metacase.com
Gardner, T.: UML Modelling of Automated Business Processes with a Mapping to BPEL4WS. In: Cardelli, L. (ed.) ECOOP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2743. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
White, S.: Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns. In: Fischer, L. (ed.) WorkflowHandbook 2004, pp. 265–294. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point (2004)
White, S.: Business Process Modeling Notation, Version 1.0 (May 2004) (Last accessed, January 29, 2006), http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/BPMN%20V1-0%20May%203%202004.pdf
Staikopoulos, A., Bordbar, B.: A Comparative Study of Meta-model Integration and Interoperability in UML and Web Services. In: Hartman, A., Kreische, D. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3748, pp. 145–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bordbar, B., Staikopoulus, A.: On behavioural Model Transformation in Web Services. In: Proc. Conceptual Modelling for Advanced Application Domain (eCOMO), Shanghai, China, pp. 667–678 (2004)
Eriksson, H.E., Penker, M.: Business Modeling with UML. Business Patterns at Work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester (2000)
Eclipse Project, http://www.eclipse.org/
Eclipse UML2 project, http://www.eclipse.org/uml2/
Eclipse EMF project, http://www.eclipse.org/emf/
Eclipse GMF project, http://www.eclipse.org/gmf/
Lauesen, S.: User Interface Design: A Software Engineering Perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Brahe, S., Østerbye, K. (2006). Business Process Modeling: Defining Domain Specific Modeling Languages by Use of UML Profiles. In: Rensink, A., Warmer, J. (eds) Model Driven Architecture – Foundations and Applications. ECMDA-FA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4066. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11787044_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11787044_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35909-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35910-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)