Abstract
This paper investigates the use of iconicity testing to evaluate symbol ‘quality’ and to examine differences in symbol perception in different ethnic groups. The paper largely replicates an earlier study by Haupt and Alant in which a communication grid of PCS symbols was evaluated with Zulu children. In our study 10 university-educated people with long experience of Western European culture are used to test the symbols. They achieve an overall symbol correctness of 50.3% (compared with Haupt and Alant’s 18.9%) and 27.8% symbols are strictly iconic (2.8% for Haupt and Alant) and 55.6 are iconic according to a lenient criterion (11.1% for Haupt and Alant). The concept of distinctiveness as defined by Haupt and Alant is also investigated, as is a method of analyzing symbols based on frequency of selection and correctness when selected. The overall conclusion is that iconicity tests can be usefully employed for assessing symbol quality and determining the difference between ethnic groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gerrish, K., Ruby, C., Sobowale, A., Birks, E.: Bridging the language barrier: the use of interpreters in primary care nursing. Health and Social Care in the Community 12(5), 407–413 (2004)
Johnson, M.: What can we learn from drawing parallels between people who use AAC and people whose first language is not English? Communication Matters 18(2), 15–17 (2004)
Johnson, M.J., Evans, D.G., Mohamed, Z.: A pilot study to investigate communication strategies in provider-patient interaction with Somalis refugees. In: Proc. HC 2006 (2006)
Cairney, S., Sless, D.: Communication effectiveness of symbolic safety signs with different user groups. Applied Ergonomics 13, 91–97 (1982)
Hanson, E.C., Hartzema, A.: Evaluating pictograms as an aid for counselling elderly and low-literate patients. Journal of Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management 9(3), 51–55 (1995)
Yovetich, W.S., Young, T.A.: The Effects of Representativeness and Concreteness on the “Guessability” of Blissymbols. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 4, 35–39 (1988)
Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G.R., Llloyd, L.L.: The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 717–725 (1990)
Fuller, D.R.: Initial study into the effects of translucency and complexity on the learning of Blissymbols by children and adults with normal cognitive abilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 7, 30–39 (1997)
Huer, M.B.: Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 16, 180–185 (2000)
Musselwhite, C.R., Ruscello, D.M.: Transparency of three communication symbol systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27, 436–443 (1984)
Mizuko, M.: Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS and Picsysms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 3, 129–136 (1987)
Dowse, R., Ehlers, M.S.: The influence of education on the interpretation of pharmaceutical pictograms for communicating medicine instructions. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 11, 11–18 (2003)
Haupt, L., Alant, E.: The iconicity of picture communication symbols for rural Zulu children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders 49, 40–49 (2003)
Doherty, J.E., Daniloff, J.K., Lloyd, L.L.: The effect of categorical presentation on AmerInd transparency. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1, 10–16 (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Evans, D.G., Bowick, L., Johnson, M., Blenkhorn, P. (2006). Using Iconicity to Evaluate Symbol Use. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4061. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11788713_127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11788713_127
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36020-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36021-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)