Skip to main content

Modelling Biological Networks by Action Languages Via Answer Set Programming

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic Programming (ICLP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4079))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe an approach to modelling biological networks by action languages via answer set programming. To this end, we propose an action language for modelling biological networks, building on previous work by Baral et al. We introduce its syntax and semantics along with a translation into answer set programming. Finally, we describe one of its applications, namely, the sulfur starvation response-pathway of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and sketch the functionality of our system and its usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reddy, V., Mavrovouniotis, M., Liebman, M.: Petri net representations in metabolic pathways. In: Proc. First ISMB, pp. 328–336 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pinney, J.W., Westhead, D.R., McConkey, G.A.: Petri net representations in systems biology. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31(pt 6), 1513–1515 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonarius, H.P.J., Schmid, G., Tramper, J.: Flux analysis of underdetermined metabolic networks: The quest for the missing constraints. Trends Biotechnol. 15, 308–314 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shmulevich, I., Dougherty, E., Kim, S., Zhang, W.: Probabilistic boolean networks: A rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics 18(2), 261–274 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baral, C., Chancellor, K., Tran, N., Tran, N., Joy, A., Berens, M.: A knowledge based approach for representing and reasoning about signaling networks. In: ISMB, pp. 15–22 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tran, N., Baral, C.: Reasoning about triggered actions in ansprolog and its application to molecular interactions in cells. In: KR 2004, pp. 554–564 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Representing action and change by logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming 17, 301–321 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action languages. Electron. Trans. Artif. Intell. 2, 193–210 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Giunchiglia, E., Lifschitz, V.: An action language based on causal explanation: preliminary report. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 623–630. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eiter, T., Faber, W., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Polleres, A.: Planning under Incomplete Knowledge. In: Palamidessi, C., Moniz Pereira, L., Lloyd, J.W., Dahl, V., Furbach, U., Kerber, M., Lau, K.-K., Sagiv, Y., Stuckey, P.J. (eds.) CL 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1861, pp. 807–821. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Tran, N., Baral, C., Shankland, C.: Issues in reasoning about interaction networks in cells: Necessity of event ordering knowledge. In: AAAI, pp. 676–681. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grell, S.: Investigation and analysis of new approaches for representing and reasoning about biological networks using action languages. Diploma thesis, University of Potsdam and Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simons, P., Niemelä, I., Soininen, T.: Extending and implementing the stable model semantics. Artificial Intelligence 138(1-2), 181–234 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. http://bioinformatics.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/bionetreasoning/

  17. Papatheodorou, I., Kakas, A.C., Sergot, M.J.: Inference of Gene Relations from Microarray Data by Abduction. In: Baral, C., Greco, G., Leone, N., Terracina, G. (eds.) LPNMR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3662, pp. 389–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Chabrier-Rivier, N., Fages, F., Soliman, S.: The Biochemical Abstract Machine BIOCHAM. In: Danos, V., Schachter, V. (eds.) CMSB 2004. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3082, pp. 172–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.: Model checking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grell, S., Schaub, T., Selbig, J. (2006). Modelling Biological Networks by Action Languages Via Answer Set Programming. In: Etalle, S., Truszczyński, M. (eds) Logic Programming. ICLP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4079. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11799573_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11799573_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36635-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36636-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics