Skip to main content

Taking Levi Identity Seriously: A Plea for Iterated Belief Contraction

  • Conference paper
Book cover Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4092))

Abstract

Most work on iterated belief change has focused on iterated belief revision, namely how to compute (K \(^{\rm *}_{x}\))\(^{\rm *}_{y}\). Historically however, belief revision can be defined in terms of belief expansion and belief contraction, where expansion and contraction are viewed as primary operators. Accordingly, our attention to iterated belief change should be focused on constructions like (K \(^{\rm +}_{x}\))\(^{\rm +}_{y}\), (K \(^{\rm --}_{x}\))\(^{\rm +}_{y}\), (K \(^{\rm +}_{x}\))\(^{\rm --}_{y}\) and (K \(^{\rm --}_{x}\))\(^{\rm --}_{y}\). The first two of these are relatively straightforward, but the last two are more problematic. Here we consider these latter, and formulate iterated belief change by employing the Levi identity and the Harper Identity as the guiding principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Konieczny, S., Papini, O., Pino Pèrez, R.: Iterated Revision by epistemic states: axioms, semantics and syntax. In: Horn, W. (ed.) Proceedings of ECAI 2000: 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 13–17. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bochman, A.: Contraction of epistemic states: A general theory. In: Williams, M.-A., Rott, H. (eds.) Frontiers in Belief Revision, pp. 195–220. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booth, R., Chopra, S., Ghose, A., Meyer, T.: A unifying semantics for belief change. In: Lopez De Mantaras, R., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proceedings of ECAI 2004: Sixteenth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 793–797. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boutilier, C.: Iterated revision and Minimal Revision of Conditional Beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 262–304 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Darwiche, A., Pearl, J.: On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision. Artifical Intelligence 89, 1–29 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grove, A.: Two modellings for theory change. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 157–170 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Nayak, A.C.: Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic Entrenchment. Erkenntnis 41, 353–390 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Nayak, A.C., Pagnucco, M., Peppas, P.: Dynamic belief revision operators. Artifical Intelligence, 193–228 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rott, H.: Change, Choice and Inference: A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rott, H.: Adjusting Priorities: Simple Representations for 27 Iterated Theory Change Operators (manuscrript) (October 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, M.-A.: Transmutations of Knowledge Systems. In: Doyle, J., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 619–629 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nayak, A., Goebel, R., Orgun, M., Pham, T. (2006). Taking Levi Identity Seriously: A Plea for Iterated Belief Contraction. In: Lang, J., Lin, F., Wang, J. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4092. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11811220_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11811220_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37033-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37035-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics