Abstract
Student involvement in the governance processes has in the case analyzed in this paper incorporated the internet for facilitating qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the teachers’ performances in class. The asynchrony evaluation ensures access, transparency, and accountability at the IT University challenging neo-institutional hypothesis on isomorphism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Scott, R.W.: Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)
DiMaggio, P., Powell, W.W.: The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: DiMaggio, P., Powell, W.W. (eds.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1991)
Danziger, J.N., Andersen, K.V.: Impacts of IT on Politics and the Public Sector: Methodological, Epistemological, and Substantive Evidence from the Golden Age of Transformation. International Journal of Public Administration 25(5), 591–627 (2002)
Easton, D.: A Systems Analysis of Political Life. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965)
Andersen, K.V., Danziger, J.N.: Information Technology and the Political World: The Impacts of IT on Capabilities, Interactions, Orientations and Values. International Journal of Public Administration 18(11), 1693–1724 (1995)
Andersen, K.V., Henriksen, H.Z.: The First Leg of E-government Research: Domain and Application Areas 1998-2003. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 1(4), 26–44 (2005)
Bretschneider, S.: Information technology, e-government, and institutional change. Public Administration Review 63(6), 738–744 (2003)
King, J.L., Kraemer, K.L.: E-government:Will the Time after Be Any Different (2003), Available from: http://www.crito.uci.edu (cited May 5, 2005)
Stamoulis, D., et al.: Revisiting public information management for effective egovernment services. Information Management & Computer Security 9(4), 146 (2001)
Affisco, J.F., Soliman, K.S.: E-government: A Strategic Operations Management Framework for Service Delivery. Business Process Management Journal 12(1), 13–21 (2006)
Gallie, W.B.: Essentially Contested Concepts. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 51, pp. 167–198 (1956)
Landman, T.: Map-Making and Analysis of the Main International Initiatives on Developing Indicators on Democracy and Good Governance (2002), Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/0/28/20755719.pdf (cited December 7, 2003)
Lipsky, M.: Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas and the Individual in Public Services. Russel Stage Foundation, New York (1980)
UNPAN. UN Global E-government Readiness Report 2005(2005), Available from: http://www.unpan.org (cited)
Srensen, E.: Brugeren og demokratiet. GRUS (53), 81–96 (1997)
Hoff, J., Horrocks, I., Tops, P. (eds.): Democratic Governance and New Technology. Routledge, London (1999)
Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Democracy Squared. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 17(2), 133–168 (2005)
Weizenbaum, J.: Computer Power and Human Reason. MIT Press, Cambridge (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Andersen, K.V. (2006). e-Participation Behind Closed Doors: Online Evaluation of Teaching Performance. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4084. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11823100_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37686-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37687-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)