Abstract
Idiotypic network models of the immune system have long attracted interest in immunology as they offer a potential explanation for the maintenance of immunological memory. They also give a possible justification for the appearance of tolerance for a certain category of cells while maintaining immunization for the others. In this paper, we provide new evidence that the manner in which affinity is defined in an idiotypic network model imposes a definite topology on the connectivity of the potential idiotypic network that can emerge. The resulting topology is responsible for very different qualitative behaviour of the network. We show that using a 2D shape-space model with affinity based on complementary regions, a cluster-free topology results that clearly divides the space into tolerant and non-tolerant zones in which antigen are maintained or rejected respectively. On the other hand, using a 2D shape-space with an affinity function based on cell similarity, a highly clustered topology emerges in which there is no separation of the space into isolated tolerant and non-tolerant zones. Using a binary shape-space, both similar and complementary affinity measures also result in highly clustered networks. In the networks whose topologies exhibit high clustering, the tolerant and intolerant zones are so intertwined that the networks either reject all antigen or tolerate all antigen.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barabasi, L.A., Albert, A.: Emergence of scaling in random network. Science 286, 509–512 (1999)
Bersini, H.: Self-assertion vs self-recogntion: A tribute to francisco varela. In: Proceedings of ICARIS 2002 (2002)
Bersini, H.: Revisiting idiotypic immune networks. In: Banzhaf, W., Ziegler, J., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T. (eds.) ECAL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2801, pp. 164–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Garret, S.: An epitope is not a paratope: Implications for immune network models and clonal selection. In: Timmis, J., Bentley, P.J., Hart, E. (eds.) ICARIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2787, pp. 217–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Hart, E.: Not all balls are round: An investigation of alternative recognition-region shapes. In: Jacob, C., Pilat, M.L., Bentley, P.J., Timmis, J.I. (eds.) ICARIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3627, pp. 29–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Hart, E., Ross, P.: The impact of the shape of antibody recognition regions on the emergence of idiotypic networks. International Journal of Unconventional Computing (2005)
Jerne, N.: The generative grammar of the immune system. Nobel Lecture, December 8, 1984, Chateau de Bellevue, France (1984)
Perelson, A.S.: Immune network theory. Immunological Reviews 10, 5–36 (1989)
Sole, R.V., Pastor-Satorras, R., Smith, E., Kepler, T.: A model of large-scale proteome evolution. Adv. In Complex Systems 5, 43–54 (2002)
Timmis, J., Neal, M.: A resource limited artificial immune system for data analysis. Knowledge Based Systems 3-4, 121–130 (2001)
Varela, F., Coutinho, A.: Second generation immune network. Immunology Today 12(5), 159–166 (1991)
Varela, F., Coutinho, A., Dupire, B., Vaz, N.: Cognitive Networks: Immune, Neural and Otherwise. Theoretical Immunology, Series on the Science of Complexity 2, 359–375 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hart, E., Bersini, H., Santos, F. (2006). Tolerance vs Intolerance: How Affinity Defines Topology in an Idiotypic Network. In: Bersini, H., Carneiro, J. (eds) Artificial Immune Systems. ICARIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4163. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11823940_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11823940_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37749-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37751-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)