Abstract
Even seven years after the directive was enacted the market share of EC-directive conforming signature cards is disappointingly low, failing to meet any involved party’s expectations. Also the lack of customers discourages companies from investing in signature products and applications. As a result almost no commercial usage for qualified electronic signatures exists. Consequently no customers seek to obtain signature products. With this contribution we examine, if economic principles are responsible for the missing adoption of qualified electronic signatures in Europe. We show that their attributes related to the rate of adoption are far from optimal. We then take a look at efforts being undertaken to increase the adoption of qualified electronic signatures. We conclude the contribution with some recommendations on how to structure a future signature market in order to speed up the diffusion process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quaterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)
De Cock, D., Wouters, K., Preneel, B.: Introduction to the Belgian EID Card. In: Katsikas, S.K., Gritzalis, S., Lopez, J. (eds.) Public Key Infrastructures, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Dialogin Brezen mesic internetu (accessed February 28, 2005), http://www.stemmark.cz/gramotnost/#f2f4a
Dumortier, J., Kelm, S., Nilsson, H., Skouma, G., Van Eecke, P.: The Legal and Market Aspects of Electronic Signatures. In: Interdisciplinary centre for Law & Information Technology, Leuven (2003)
EC-Directive 1999/93/EC. Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliment and of the Council on a Community framework for electronic signatures (1999)
Fritsch, L., Roßnagel, H.: Die Krise des Signaturmarktes: Lösungsansätze aus betriebswirtschaftlicher Sicht. In: Ferderrath, H. (ed.) Sicherheit 2005, Bonn. Köllen Druck+Verlag GmbH, pp. 315–327 (2005)
Hvarre, J.: Electronic signatures in Denmark: free for all citizens. e-Signature Law Journal 1(1), 12–17 (2004)
Koppe, V.: Die Geldkarte der deutschen Kreditwirtschaft: Aktuelle Situation und Ausblick (accessed February 28, 2005), http://www.geldkarte.de
Lippmann, S., Roßnagel, H.: Geschäftsmodelle für signaturgesetzkonforme Trust Center. In: Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J., Eckert, S., Isselhorst, T. (eds.) Wirtschaftsinformatik 2005, pp. 1167–1187. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2005)
Lopez, J., Opplinger, R., Pernul, G.: Why Have Public Key Infrastructures Failed So Far? Internet Research 15(5), 544–556 (2005)
Mahler, A., Rogers, E.M.: The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass. Telecommunications Policy 23, 719–740 (1999)
Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 173–191 (1991)
Oren, S.S., Smith, S.A.: Critical Mass and Tariff Structure in Electronic Communications Markets. The Bell Journal of Economics 12(2), 467–487 (1981)
Reichl, H., Roßnagel, A., Müller, G. (eds.): Digitaler Personalausweis: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden (2005)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)
Roßnagel, A.: Eine konzertierte Aktion für die elektronische Signatur. Multimedia und Recht 1, 1–2 (2003)
Roßnagel, A., Fischer-Dieskau, S.: Elektronische Dokumente als Beweismittel. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 59, 806–809 (2006)
Roßnagel, H.: Mobile Signatures and Certification on Demand. In: Katsikas, S.K., Gritzalis, S., Lopez, J. (eds.) Public Key Infrastructures, pp. 274–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Shapiro, C., Varian, H.R.: Information Rules. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)
Taylor, S., Todd, P.A.: Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research 6(2), 144–176 (1995)
Varian, H.R.: Price Discrimination and Social Welfare. The American Economic Review 75(4), 870–875 (1985)
Whitten, A., Tygar, J.: Why Johnny Can’t Encrypt:Why Johnny Can’t Encrypt: A Usability Evaluation of PGP 5.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 169–183 (August 1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roßnagel, H. (2006). On Diffusion and Confusion – Why Electronic Signatures Have Failed. In: Fischer-Hübner, S., Furnell, S., Lambrinoudakis, C. (eds) Trust and Privacy in Digital Business. TrustBus 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4083. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11824633_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11824633_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37750-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37752-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)