Skip to main content

A Framework of Cooperative Agents with Implicit Support for Ontologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4149))

Abstract

W3C’s OWL has gained wide acceptance in the agent community and it has already been used in many agent applications which we think syntactically. By taking advantage of OWL’s description logic foundation, this paper defines a hybrid description logic language which facilitates the use of ontologies as first class entities in agent communication. Using this language, we axiomatize cooperative agent behavior. Then we suggest an operational model to implement this behavior. As a case study, we present an application from software package management domain that tests the model’s usability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., McEntire, R.: KQML as an Agent Communication Language. In: Adam, N., Bhargava, B., Yesha, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 1994), Gaithersburg, pp. 456–463. ACM Press, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, H., Perich, F., Chakraborty, D., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: Intelligent agents meet semantic web in a smart meeting room. In: AAMAS 2004: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Washington, pp. 854–861. IEEE Computer Society (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zou, Y., Finin, T., Ding, L., Chen, H., Pan, R.: Using Semantic web technology in Multi-Agent systems: a case study in the TAGA Trading agent environment. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dikenelli, O., Erdur, R.C., Kardas, G., Gümüs, Ö., Seylan, I., Gürcan, Ö., Tiryaki, A.M., Ekinci, E.E.: Developing multi agent systems on semantic web environment using seagent platform. In: Dikenelli, O., Gleizes, M.-P., Ricci, A. (eds.) ESAW 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3963, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Botelho, L., Willmott, S., Zhang, T., Dale, J.: Review of content languages suitable for agent-agent communication. Technical Report 200233, EPFL I&C (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. J. of Web Semantics 3, 23–40 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erdur, R.C., Seylan, I.: An extended description logics approach to agent communication language semantics. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS 2006 Workshop on Agent Communication (AC 2006) (2006), http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/rogier/AC2006/

  8. Louis, V., Martinez, T.: The jade semantic agent: Towards agent communication oriented middleware. AgentLink News, 16–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schild, K.: A correspondence theory for terminological logics: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1991, 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sidney, AU, pp. 466–471 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Laux, A.: Terminological logics with modal operators. Technical Report RR-94-33, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH, Erwin-Schrödinger Strasse, Postfach 2080, 67608 Kaiserslautern, Germany (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Wolter, F.: Extensions to description logics. In: [26], pp. 219–261

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: Satisfiability problem in description logics with modal operators. In: Cohn, A.G., Schubert, L., Shapiro, S.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1998), Montreal, Canada, pp. 512–523. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baader, F., Nutt, W.: Basic description logics. In: [26], pp. 43–95

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. J. of Web Semantics 1, 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Artale, A., Franconi, E.: A survey of temporal extensions of description logics. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 30, 171–210 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D.: Expressive description logics. In: [26], pp. 178–218

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sycara, K., Williamson, M., Decker, K.: Unified information and control flow in hierarchical task networks. In: Working Notes of the AAAI 1996 workshop Theories of Action, Planning, and Control (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chellas, B.F.: Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gasquet, O., Herzig, A.: From classical to normal modal logics. In: Wansing, H. (ed.) Proof Theory of Modal Logics. Applied Logic Series, vol. 2, pp. 293–311. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herzig, A., Longin, D.: A logic of intention with cooperation principles and with assertive speech acts as communication primitives. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 920–927. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pitt, J., Mamdani, A.: Some remarks on the semantics of fipa’s agent communication language. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2, 333–356 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, M.P.: Agent communication languages: Rethinking the principles. IEEE Computer 31, 40–47 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laux, A.: Representing belief in multi-agent worlds via terminological logics. Technical Report RR-93-29, DFKI, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH, Erwin-Schrödinger Strasse, Postfach 2080, 67608 Kaiserslautern, Germany (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Perram, J., Van de Velde, W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Bellifemine, F., Rimassa, G.: Developing multi-agent systems with a fipa-compliant agent framework. Softw. Pract. Exper. 31, 103–128 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erdur, R.C., Seylan, I. (2006). A Framework of Cooperative Agents with Implicit Support for Ontologies. In: Klusch, M., Rovatsos, M., Payne, T.R. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents X. CIA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11839354_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38569-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38570-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics