Skip to main content

Modelling Multi-modal Learning in a Hawkmoth

  • Conference paper
Book cover From Animals to Animats 9 (SAB 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4095))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The moth Macroglossum stellatarum can learn the colour and sometimes the odour of a rewarding food source. We present data from 20 different experiments with different combinations of blue and yellow artificial flowers and the two odours honeysuckle and lavender. The experiments show that learning about the odours depends on the colour used. By training on different colour-odour combinations and testing on others, it becomes possible to investigate the exact relation between the two modalities during learning. Three computational models were tested in the same experimental situations as the real moths and their predictions were compared to the experimental data. The average error over all experiments as well as the largest deviation from the experimental data were calculated. Neither the Rescorla-Wagner model or a learning model with independent learning for each stimulus component were able to explain the experimental data. We present the new categorisation model, which assumes that the moth learns a template for the sensory attributes of the rewarding stimulus. This model produces behaviour that closely matches that of the real moth in all 20 experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson, S.: Foraging responses in the butterflies Inachis io, Aglais urticae (nymphalidae), and Gonepteryx rhamni (pieridae) to floral scents. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1–11 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balkenius, A., Kelber, A.: Colour constancy in diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 3307–3316 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balkenius, A., Kelber, A.: Colour preferences influence odour learning in the hawkmoth, Macroglossum stellatarum. Naturwissenschaften, 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balkenius, A., Kelber, A., Balkenius, C.: A model of selection between stimulus and place strategy in a hawkmoth. Adaptive Behavior 12(1), 21–35 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balkenius, A., Rosén, W., Kelber, A.: The relative importance of olfaction and vision in a diurnal and a nocturnal hawkmoth. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 192(4), 431–437 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brantjes, N.B.M.: Sensory responses to flowers in night-flying moths. In: Richards, A.J. (ed.) The pollinaton of flowers by insects, pp. 13–19. The Dorset Press, Dorchester (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Couvillon, P.A., Arakaki, L., Bitterman, M.E.: Intramodal blocking in honeybees. Anim. Learn. Behav. 25, 277–282 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Couvillon, P.A., Campos, A.C., Bass, T.D., Bitterman, M.E.: Intermodal blocking in honeybees. Exp. Psychol. Soc. 54B, 369–381 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Couvillon, P.A., Mateo, E.T., Bitterman, M.E.: Reward and learning in honeybees: Analysis of an overshadowing effect. Anim. Learn. Behav. 24, 19–27 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham, J.P., Moore, C.J., Zalucki, M.P., West, S.A.: Learning, odour preference and flower foraging in moths. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 87–94 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Funayama, E.S., Couvillon, P.A., Bitterman, M.E.: Compound conditioning in honeybees: Blocking tests of the independence assumption. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23, 429–437 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallistel, R.C.: The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gerber, B., Ullrich, J.: No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1839–1854 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giurfa, M., Núñez, J., Backhaus, W.: Odour and colour information in the foraging choice behaviour of the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 175, 773–779 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giurfa, M., Núñez, J., Chittka, L., Menzel, R.: Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 177, 247–259 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera, C.M.: Activity pattern and thermal biology of a day-flying hawkmoth (Macroglossum stellatarum) under mediterranean summer conditions. Ecol. Entomol. 17, 52–56 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamin, L.J.: Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In: Campbell, B.A., Church, R.M. (eds.) Punishment and Aversive Behavior, pp. 279–296. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelber, A.: Innate preferences for flower features in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 826–835 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelber, A., Hénique, U.: Trichromatic colour vision in the hummingbird hawkmoth, Macroglossum stellatarum. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 184, 535–541 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M., Osorio, D.: Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol. Rev. 78, 81–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunze, J., Gumbert, A.: The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav. Ecol. 12, 447–456 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, R.C., Kay, M.G.: Data fusion and sensor integration: state-of-the-art 1990s. In: Abidi, M.A., Gonzalez, R.C. (eds.) Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence. Academic Press, Boston (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mackintosh, N.J.: The Physiology of Animal Learning. Academic Press, London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Menzel, R.: Untersuchungen zum erlernen von spektralfarben durch die honigbiene (Apis mellifica). Z. t vergl. Physiol. 56, 25–37 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pavlov, I.P.: Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pelz, C., Gerber, B., Menzel, R.: Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. J. Exp. Biol. 200, 837–847 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pfaff, M., Kelber, A.: Ein vielseitiger Futterspender für anthophile Insekten. Entomol. Zt. 113, 360–361 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Raguso, R.A., Willis, M.A.: Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naive hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim. Behav. 64, 685–695 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rowe, C.: Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim. Behav. 58, 921–931 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Srinivasan, M.V., Zhang, S.W., Zhu, H.: Honeybees links sight to smell. Nature 396, 637–638 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. von Frisch, K.: Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool. Jb. Abt. Zool. Physiol. 15, 193–260 (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  32. von Frisch, K.: Über den Geruchssinn der Bienen und seine blütenbiologische Bedeutung. Zool. Jb. Abt. Zool. Physiol. 37, 2–238 (1919)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weiss, M.: Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim. Behav. 53, 1043–1052 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weiss, M.: Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In: Chittka, L., Thomson, J.D. (eds.) Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, pp. 171–190. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Zentall, T.R., Riley, D.A.: Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. J. gen. Psychol. 127, 45–66 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balkenius, A., Kelber, A., Balkenius, C. (2006). Modelling Multi-modal Learning in a Hawkmoth. In: Nolfi, S., et al. From Animals to Animats 9. SAB 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11840541_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11840541_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38608-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38615-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics