Skip to main content

Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis with Neural Networks

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4132))

Abstract

Although, there is an ongoing belief in the investment community that technical analysis can be used to infer the direction of future prices, the academic community always treated it (at best) with skepticism. However, if there is a degree of effectiveness in technical analysis, that necessarily lies in direct contrast with the efficient market hypothesis. In this paper, we use neural network estimators to infer from technical trading rules how to extrapolate future price movements. To the extend that the total return of a technical trading strategy can be regarded as a measure of predictability, technical analysis can be seen as a test of the independent increments version of random walk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brock, W., Lakonishok, J., LeBaron, B.: Simple technical rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47, 1731–1764 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, J., Lo, A., MacKinlay, A.: The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, New Jersey (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lo, A., Mamaysky, H., Wang, J.: Foundations of technical analysis: Computational algorithms, statistical inference, and empirical implementation. The Journal of Finance 4, 1705–1765 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Neftci, S., Policano, A.: Can chartists outperform the market? Market efficiency tests for “technical analysis”. The Journal of Futures Markets 4, 465–478 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Refenes, A., Zapranis, A.: Neural model identification, variable selection and model adequacy. Journal of Forecasting 18, 299–332 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan, R., Timmermann, A., White, H.: Data-snooping, technical trading rule performance, and the bootstrap. The Journal of Finance 54, 1647–1691 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zapranis, A. (2006). Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis with Neural Networks. In: Kollias, S., Stafylopatis, A., Duch, W., Oja, E. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2006. ICANN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11840930_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11840930_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38871-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38873-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics