Abstract
Although, there is an ongoing belief in the investment community that technical analysis can be used to infer the direction of future prices, the academic community always treated it (at best) with skepticism. However, if there is a degree of effectiveness in technical analysis, that necessarily lies in direct contrast with the efficient market hypothesis. In this paper, we use neural network estimators to infer from technical trading rules how to extrapolate future price movements. To the extend that the total return of a technical trading strategy can be regarded as a measure of predictability, technical analysis can be seen as a test of the independent increments version of random walk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brock, W., Lakonishok, J., LeBaron, B.: Simple technical rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. The Journal of Finance 47, 1731–1764 (1992)
Campbell, J., Lo, A., MacKinlay, A.: The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton, New Jersey (1997)
Lo, A., Mamaysky, H., Wang, J.: Foundations of technical analysis: Computational algorithms, statistical inference, and empirical implementation. The Journal of Finance 4, 1705–1765 (2000)
Neftci, S., Policano, A.: Can chartists outperform the market? Market efficiency tests for “technical analysis”. The Journal of Futures Markets 4, 465–478 (1984)
Refenes, A., Zapranis, A.: Neural model identification, variable selection and model adequacy. Journal of Forecasting 18, 299–332 (1999)
Sullivan, R., Timmermann, A., White, H.: Data-snooping, technical trading rule performance, and the bootstrap. The Journal of Finance 54, 1647–1691 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zapranis, A. (2006). Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis with Neural Networks. In: Kollias, S., Stafylopatis, A., Duch, W., Oja, E. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks – ICANN 2006. ICANN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11840930_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11840930_69
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38871-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38873-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)