Skip to main content

Supporting Open and Closed World Reasoning on the Web

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning (PPSWR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4187))

Abstract

In this paper general mechanisms and syntactic restrictions are explored in order to specify and merge rule bases in the Semantic Web. Rule bases are expressed by extended logic programs having two forms of negation, namely strong (or explicit) and weak (also known as default negation or negation-as-failure). The proposed mechanisms are defined by very simple modular program transformations, and integrate both open and closed world reasoning. These program transformations are shown to be appropriate for the two major semantics for extended logic programs: answer set semantics and well-founded semantics with explicit negation. Moreover, the results obtained by both semantics are compared.

This research has been partially funded by European Commission and by the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science within the 6th Framework Programme project REWERSE number 506779 (cf. http://rewerse.net)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alferes, J.J., Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: A logic programming system for non-monotonic reasoning. Journal of Automated Reasoning 14(1), 93–147 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Analyti, A., Antoniou, G., Damásio, C.V., Wagner, G.: Stable Model Theory for Extended RDF Ontologies. In: 4th Int. Semantic Web Conf., pp. 21–36 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bugliesi, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P.: Modularity in logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming 12(1) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CWM-closed world machine, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html

  6. Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M.: A survey of paraconsistent semantics for logic programs. In: Gabbay, D., Smets, P. (eds.) Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, vol. 2, pp. 241–320. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duerst, Suignard: Internationalized Resource Identifiers. RFC 3987 (January 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: A uniform integration of higher-order reasoning and external evaluations in answer-set programming. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2005, pp. 90–96. Professional Book Center (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gavriloaie, R., Nejdl, W., Olmedilla, D., Seamons, K.E., Winslett, M.: No registration needed: How to use declarative policies and negotiation to access sensitive resources on the semantic web. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 342–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Logic programs with classical negation. In: Warren, Szeredi (eds.) Proc. of 7th ICLP, pp. 579–597. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heflin, J., Avila, H.M.: Lcw-based agent planning for the semantic web. In: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. WS-02-11, pp. 63–70. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herre, H., Jaspars, J., Wagner, G.: Partial Logics with Two Kinds of Negation as a Foundation of Knowledge-Based Reasoning. In: Gabbay, D.M., Wansing, H. (eds.) What Is Negation? Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission (May 21, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kifer, M., de Bruijn, J., Boley, H., Fensel, D.: A realistic architecture for the semantic web. In: Adi, A., Stoutenburg, S., Tabet, S. (eds.) RuleML 2005. LNCS, vol. 3791, pp. 17–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pereira, L.M., Alferes, J.J.: Well founded semantics for logic programs with explicit negation. In: Neumann, B. (ed.) ECAI 1992, pp. 102–106. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. The rule interchange WG charter, http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/charter

  17. The Rule Markup Initiative (RuleML). available at: http://www.ruleml.org

  18. Sagonas, K., Swift, T., Warren, D.S.: XSB as an efficient deductive database engine. In: Proc. of SIGMOD 1994 Conference. ACM, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sakama, C., Inoue, K.: Paraconsistent Stable Semantics for extended disjunctive programs. Journal of Logic and Computation 5(3), 265–285 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Shepherdson, J.: Negation in logic programming for general logic programs. In: Minker, J. (ed.) Found. of Ded. Databases and Logic Programming, pp. 19–88. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shepherdson, J.C.: Negation as failure: a comparison of Clark’s completed data base and Reiter’s CWA. Journal of Logic Programming 1(1), 51–79 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sintek, M., Decker, S.: TRIPLE - A Query, Inference, and Transformation Language for the Semantic Web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 364–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner, G.: Web Rules Need Two Kinds of Negation. In: Bry, F., Henze, N., Małuszyński, J. (eds.) PPSWR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2901, pp. 33–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, G., Kifer, M., Zhao, C.: Flora-2: A Rule-Based Know. Representation and Inference Infrastructure for the Sem. Web. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Schmidt, D.C. (eds.) CoopIS 2003, DOA 2003, and ODBASE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2888, pp. 671–688. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Damásio, C.V., Analyti, A., Antoniou, G., Wagner, G. (2006). Supporting Open and Closed World Reasoning on the Web. In: Alferes, J.J., Bailey, J., May, W., Schwertel, U. (eds) Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning. PPSWR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11853107_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11853107_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-39586-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39587-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics