Abstract
This paper presents a new ontology mapping method. This method addresses the case in which a non-structured ontology is to be mapped with a structured one. Both ontologies are composed of triplets of the form (object, characteristic, value). Structured means that the values describing the objects according to a given characteristic are hierarchically organized using the a kind of relation. The proposed method uses fuzzy conceptual graphs [8] to represent and map objects from a source ontology to a target one. First, we establish a correspondence between characteristics of the source ontology and characteristics of the target ontology based on the comparison of their associated values. Then, we propose an original way of translating the description of an object of the source ontology using characteristics and values of the target ontology. The description thus translated is represented as a fuzzy conceptual graph. Finally, a new projection operation is used to find mappings between translated objects and actual objects of the target ontology. This method has been implemented and the results of an experimentation concerning the mapping of ontologies in the field of risk in food are presented.
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11914853_71.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aumueller, D., Do, H., Massmann, S., Rahm, E.: Schema and ontology matching with coma++. In: SIGMOD Conference, pp. 906–908 (2005)
Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.Y.: Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In: WWW 2002, pp. 662–673 (2002)
Dragut, E., Lawrence, R.: Domain independent learning of ontology mappings. In: International Conference on Ontologies, pp. 783–800 (2004)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: The three semantics of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 141–150 (1997)
Egghe, L., Michel, C.: Strong similarity measures for ordered sets of documents in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management 38, 823–848 (2002)
Ireland, J.D., Moller, A.: Review of international food classification and description. Journal of food composition and analysis 13, 529–538 (2000)
Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, W.M.: Ontology mapping: The state of the art, Semantic Interoperability and Integration (2005)
Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Reading (1984)
Thomopoulos, R., Buche, P., Haemmerlé, O.: Different kinds of comparisons between fuzzy conceptual graphs. In: Ganter, B., de Moor, A., Lex, W. (eds.) ICCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2746, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Wiesman, F., Roos, N.: Domain independent learning of ontology mappings. In: AAMAS, pp. 844–849 (2004)
Ming, G., Yang, Y., Shanping, L., Sailong, H.: A comparative study on three ontology mapping methods in the integration of product knowledge. In: WCICA, pp. 3093–3097 (2004)
Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Information and control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 3–28 (1978)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doussot, D., Buche, P., Dibie-Barthélemy, J., Haemmerlé, O. (2006). Using Fuzzy Conceptual Graphs to Map Ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE. OTM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4275. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11914853_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11914853_55
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48287-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48289-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)