Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4246))

Abstract

This paper presents systems for first-order intuitionistic logic and several of its extensions in which all the propositional rules are local, in the sense that, in applying the rules of the system, one needs only a fixed amount of information about the logical expressions involved. The main source of non-locality is the contraction rules. We show that the contraction rules can be restricted to the atomic ones, provided we employ deep-inference, i.e., to allow rules to apply anywhere inside logical expressions. We further show that the use of deep inference allows for modular extensions of intuitionistic logic to Dummett’s intermediate logic LC, Gödel logic and classical logic. We present the systems in the calculus of structures, a proof theoretic formalism which supports deep-inference. Cut elimination for these systems are proved indirectly by simulating the cut-free sequent systems, or the hypersequent systems in the cases of Dummett’s LC and Gödel logic, in the cut free systems in the calculus of structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avron, A.: Hypersequents, logical consequence and intermediate logics for concurrency. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 4, 225–248 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baaz, M., Ciabattoni, A.: A Schütte-Tait Style Cut-Elimination Proof for First-Order Gödel Logic. In: Egly, U., Fermüller, C. (eds.) TABLEAUX 2002. LNCS, vol. 2381, pp. 24–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Balat, V., Galmiche, D.: Labelled proof systems for intuitionistic provability, pp. 1–32 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brünnler, K.: Deep Inference and Symmetry in Classical Proofs. PhD thesis, TU Dresden (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brünnler, K.: Two restrictions on contraction. Logic Journal of the IGPL 11(5), 525–529 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Brünnler, K.: Intuitionistic logic in the calculus of structures (unpublished notes) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brünnler, K., Tiu, A.F.: A local system for classical logic. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2001. LNCS, vol. 2250, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dummett, M.: A propositional calculus with denumerable matrix. J. Symbolic Logic 24(2), 97–106 (1959)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dummett, M.: Element of Intuitionism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dyckhoff, R.: Contraction-free sequent calculi for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57(3), 795–807 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Goré, R.: Substructural logics on display. Logic Journal of the IGPL 6(3), 451–504 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Guglielmi, A.: A system of interaction and structure. Technical Report WV-02-10, TU Dresden. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (accepted, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guiraud, Y.: The three dimensions of proofs. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horsfall, B.: Towards BI in the calculus of structures. In: ESSLLI 2006 (accepted, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hudelmaier, J.: Bounds on cut-elimination in intuitionistic propositional logic. Archive for Mathematical Logic 31, 331–354 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahramanoğulları, O.: Reducing Nondeterminism in the Calculus of Structures. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2006. LNCS, vol. 4246, pp. 272–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) (accepted at)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. McKinley, R.: Classical Categories and Deep Inference. PhD thesis, University of Bath (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Hearn, P., Pym, D.: The logic of bunched implications. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5(2), 215–243 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart, C., Stouppa, P.: A systematic proof theory for several modal logics. In: Schmidt, R., Pratt-Hartmann, I., Reynolds, M., Wansing, H. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 5, pp. 309–333. King’s College Publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Straßburger, L.: Linear Logic and Noncommutativity in the Calculus of Structures. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Takeuti, G., Titani, S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy logic and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. J. Symbolic Logic 49(3), 851–866 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Troelstra, A., Schwichtenberg, H.: Basic Proof Theory. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tiu, A. (2006). A Local System for Intuitionistic Logic. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4246. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11916277_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11916277_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-48281-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48282-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics