Skip to main content

Risk, Utility and PRAM

  • Conference paper
Privacy in Statistical Databases (PSD 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4302))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

PRAM (Post Randomization Method) is a disclosure control method for microdata, introduced in 1997. Unfortunately, PRAM has not yet been applied extensively by statistical agencies in protecting their microdata. This is partly due to the fact that little knowledge is available on the effect of PRAM on disclosure control as well as on the loss of information it induces.

In this paper, we will try to make up for this lack of knowledge, by supplying some empirical information on the behaviour of PRAM. To be able to achieve this, some basic measures for loss of information and disclosure risk will be introduced. PRAM will be applied to one specific microdata file of over 6 million records, using several models in applying the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L., Gouweleeuw, J.:: A method for disclosure limitation of microdata. Research paper 9705, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gouweleeuw, J., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L., de Wolf, P.P.: Post randomisation for statistical disclosure control: Theory and implementation. Journal of Official Statistics 14(4), 463–478 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Wolf, P.P., Gouweleeuw, J., Kooiman, P., Willenborg, L.: Reflections on pram. In: Statistical Data Protection, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 337–349 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van den Hout, A.: The analysis of data perturbed by pram. Delft Univsersity Press, Delft (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. van den Hout, A., van der Heijden, P.G.M.: Randomized response, statistical disclosure control and misclassification: a review. International Statistical Review 70(2), 269–288 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ronning, G., Rosemann, M., Strotmann, H.: Estimation of the probit model using anonymized micro data. In: European Conference on Quality and Methodology in Official Statistics (Q 2004), May 2004, pp. 24–26. Mainz (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warner, S.L.: Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 60, 63–69 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, T.T.: Analysis of randomized response as purposively misclassified data. In: Proceedings of the section on survey research methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 158–163 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Press, S.J.: Estimating from misclassified data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63, 123–133 (1968)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuha, J., Skinner, C.: Categorical data analysis and misclassification. In: Lyberg, Biemer, Collins, de Leeuw, Dippo, Schwarz, Trewin (eds.) Survey measurement and process quality, pp. 633–670. Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fienberg, S.E.: Conflict between the needs for access to statistical information and demands for confidentiality. Journal of Official Statistics 10(2), 115–132 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Torra, V.: Disclosure control methods and information loss for microdata. In: Doyle, P., Lane, J., Theeuwes, J., Zayatz, L. (eds.) Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Acces: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies, pp. 91–110. Elsevier, North-Holland (2001a)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Domingo-Ferrer, J., Torra, V.: A quantitative comparison of disclosure control methods for microdata. In: Doyle, P., Lane, J., Theeuwes, J., Zayatz, L. (eds.) Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Acces: Theory and Practical Applications for Statistical Agencies, pp. 111–133. Elsevier, North-Holland (2001b)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rienstra, M.: Aanzet tot een nieuwe beveiligingsregel bij gebruik van pram. Internal report 283-03-SOO, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg (2003) (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Wolf, PP. (2006). Risk, Utility and PRAM. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Franconi, L. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4302. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11930242_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11930242_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-49330-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49332-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics